UNLABELLED: Development of potential cancer chemopreventive drugs involves the systematic evaluation of these drugs in preliminary Phase I and II studies in human beings to identify the optimal drug dose, drug toxicity, and surrogate end point biomarker modulation. OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that aspirin, at a single, once-daily 81-mg dose, will reduce colonic mucosal concentration of prostaglandin estradiol (E2) in individuals at high risk for colorectal cancer development similar to our prior observations in a young normal-risk population. METHODS: Aspirin was administered at a dose of 81 mg once daily for 28 days in a cohort of 92 matched high-risk and normal-risk colorectal cancer subjects. Prostaglandin E2 and cyclooxygenase expression were assayed from distal sigmoid biopsies from all of the subjects before and after treatment. RESULTS: The mean prostaglandin E2 for normal-risk subjects before aspirin treatment was 11.3 +/- 1.7 pg/microg (mean +/- SE) tissue protein and after aspirin treatment was 4.9 +/- 0.91 pg/microg tissue protein (P < 0.0001). In high-risk subjects, mean pretreatment prostaglandin E2 was 14.4 +/- 1.7 pg/microg tissue protein and after aspirin treatment was 4.7 +/- 0.70 pg/microg tissue protein (P < 0.0001). Aspirin treatment did not alter cyclooxygenase-1 protein expression. CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin treatment at a dose of 81 mg reduces colorectal mucosal prostaglandin E2 concentration after 28 daily doses. Risk for colorectal carcinoma did not modify colorectal mucosal baseline or post-aspirin prostaglandin E2, or cyclooxygenase expression. Colorectal mucosal prostaglandin concentration may be used as a "drug-effect surrogate biomarker," that is, a surrogate to assess sufficient delivery and tissue effect of a chemopreventive agent.
UNLABELLED: Development of potential cancer chemopreventive drugs involves the systematic evaluation of these drugs in preliminary Phase I and II studies in human beings to identify the optimal drug dose, drug toxicity, and surrogate end point biomarker modulation. OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that aspirin, at a single, once-daily 81-mg dose, will reduce colonic mucosal concentration of prostaglandin estradiol (E2) in individuals at high risk for colorectal cancer development similar to our prior observations in a young normal-risk population. METHODS:Aspirin was administered at a dose of 81 mg once daily for 28 days in a cohort of 92 matched high-risk and normal-risk colorectal cancer subjects. ProstaglandinE2 and cyclooxygenase expression were assayed from distal sigmoid biopsies from all of the subjects before and after treatment. RESULTS: The mean prostaglandin E2 for normal-risk subjects before aspirin treatment was 11.3 +/- 1.7 pg/microg (mean +/- SE) tissue protein and after aspirin treatment was 4.9 +/- 0.91 pg/microg tissue protein (P < 0.0001). In high-risk subjects, mean pretreatment prostaglandin E2 was 14.4 +/- 1.7 pg/microg tissue protein and after aspirin treatment was 4.7 +/- 0.70 pg/microg tissue protein (P < 0.0001). Aspirin treatment did not alter cyclooxygenase-1 protein expression. CONCLUSIONS:Aspirin treatment at a dose of 81 mg reduces colorectal mucosalprostaglandin E2 concentration after 28 daily doses. Risk for colorectal carcinoma did not modify colorectal mucosal baseline or post-aspirinprostaglandin E2, or cyclooxygenase expression. Colorectal mucosalprostaglandin concentration may be used as a "drug-effect surrogate biomarker," that is, a surrogate to assess sufficient delivery and tissue effect of a chemopreventive agent.
Authors: Patricia A Thompson; Betsy C Wertheim; Jason A Zell; Wen-Pin Chen; Christine E McLaren; Bonnie J LaFleur; Frank L Meyskens; Eugene W Gerner Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Zora Djuric; Mack T Ruffin; Mary E Rapai; Maria L Cornellier; Jianwei Ren; Thomas G Ferreri; Leah M Askew; Ananda Sen; Dean E Brenner; D Kim Turgeon Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-05-26 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: C Henrique Serezani; Steve Kane; Alexandra I Medeiros; Ashley M Cornett; Sang-Hoon Kim; Mariana Morato Marques; Sang-Pyo Lee; Casey Lewis; Emilie Bourdonnay; Megan N Ballinger; Eric S White; Marc Peters-Golden Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: Suzanna M Zick; D Kim Turgeon; Jianwei Ren; Mack T Ruffin; Benjamin D Wright; Ananda Sen; Zora Djuric; Dean E Brenner Journal: Mol Carcinog Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 4.784
Authors: Robert E Carroll; Richard V Benya; Danielle Kim Turgeon; Shaiju Vareed; Malloree Neuman; Luz Rodriguez; Madhuri Kakarala; Philip M Carpenter; Christine McLaren; Frank L Meyskens; Dean E Brenner Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2011-03
Authors: David C Montrose; Krishna Kadaveru; Jillian N M Ilsley; Sierra H Root; Thiruchanduri V Rajan; Manish Ramesh; Frank C Nichols; Bruce T Liang; Dmitry Sonin; Arthur R Hand; Simona Zarini; Robert C Murphy; Glenn S Belinsky; Masako Nakanishi; Daniel W Rosenberg Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Suzanna M Zick; D Kim Turgeon; Shaiju K Vareed; Mack T Ruffin; Amie J Litzinger; Benjamin D Wright; Sara Alrawi; Daniel P Normolle; Zora Djuric; Dean E Brenner Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2011-10-11
Authors: Yuyi Wang; Chi Du; Nan Zhang; Mei Li; Yanyang Liu; Maoyuan Zhao; Feng Wang; Feng Luo Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 2.967
Authors: Veronika Fedirko; Patrick T Bradshaw; Jane C Figueiredo; Robert S Sandler; Elizabeth L Barry; Dennis J Ahnen; Ginger L Milne; Robert S Bresalier; John A Baron Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2015-08-24