Literature DB >> 11352696

Survival in Academy Award-winning actors and actresses.

D A Redelmeier1, S M Singh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social status is an important predictor of poor health. Most studies of this issue have focused on the lower echelons of society.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the increase in status from winning an academy award is associated with long-term mortality among actors and actresses.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis.
SETTING: Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. PARTICIPANTS: All actors and actresses ever nominated for an academy award in a leading or a supporting role were identified (n = 762). For each, another cast member of the same sex who was in the same film and was born in the same era was identified (n = 887). MEASUREMENTS: Life expectancy and all-cause mortality rates.
RESULTS: All 1649 performers were analyzed; the median duration of follow-up time from birth was 66 years, and 772 deaths occurred (primarily from ischemic heart disease and malignant disease). Life expectancy was 3.9 years longer for Academy Award winners than for other, less recognized performers (79.7 vs. 75.8 years; P = 0.003). This difference was equal to a 28% relative reduction in death rates (95% CI, 10% to 42%). Adjustment for birth year, sex, and ethnicity yielded similar results, as did adjustments for birth country, possible name change, age at release of first film, and total films in career. Additional wins were associated with a 22% relative reduction in death rates (CI, 5% to 35%), whereas additional films and additional nominations were not associated with a significant reduction in death rates.
CONCLUSION: The association of high status with increased longevity that prevails in the public also extends to celebrities, contributes to a large survival advantage, and is partially explained by factors related to success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11352696     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-10-200105150-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  22 in total

1.  Death in Hollywood.

Authors:  G D Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001 Dec 22-29

2.  Longevity of screenwriters who win an academy award: longitudinal study.

Authors:  D A Redelmeier; S M Singh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001 Dec 22-29

3.  Research of the Holiday kind. Celestial determinants of success in research.

Authors:  R Pollex; B Hegele; M R Ban
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-12-11       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Getting on track: how scientific journals and mainstream journalists could do a better job of communicating with the public.

Authors:  André Picard
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  The income and health effects of tribal casino gaming on American Indians.

Authors:  Barbara Wolfe; Jessica Jakubowski; Robert Haveman; Marissa Courey
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2012-05

6.  Do not go gentle into that good night: the effect of retirement on subsequent mortality of U.S. Supreme Court justices, 1801-2006.

Authors:  Ross M Stolzenberg
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2011-11

7.  Retirement and death in office of U.S. Supreme Court justices.

Authors:  Ross M Stolzenberg; James Lindgren
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2010-05

Review 8.  Coagulopathy and transfusion strategies in trauma. Overwhelmed by literature, supported by weak evidence.

Authors:  Daniele Poole
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.443

9.  Maternal work and birth outcome disparities.

Authors:  Janice F Bell; Frederick J Zimmerman; Paula K Diehr
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-08-15

Review 10.  Top ten errors of statistical analysis in observational studies for cancer research.

Authors:  A Carmona-Bayonas; P Jimenez-Fonseca; A Fernández-Somoano; F Álvarez-Manceñido; E Castañón; A Custodio; F A de la Peña; R M Payo; L P Valiente
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.