Literature DB >> 11352618

Comparison of orientation maps obtained with different number of stimulus orientations.

T Womelsdorf1, U T Eysel, Z F Kisvárday.   

Abstract

The structure of orientation maps computed from a different number of stimulus orientations was studied in visual cortical area 18 of the cat. Single condition maps (SCMs) were obtained to 16 stimulus orientations, of which angle maps were generated using 4, 8, and 16 SCMs corresponding to multiples of 45, 22.5, and 11.25 degrees, respectively. The overall orientation distribution of the three types of maps was compared on a pixel-by-pixel basis. Twenty percent of the pixels of the 4-orientations maps differed by more than +/-17 degrees from those produced by 16 orientations. Maps of 8 orientations differed by 6.4 and 5.8% from those of 4 and 16 orientations, respectively. Structural differences between the maps were mainly found at locations displaying high rate of change in orientation preference, i.e., orientation centers and adjoining short, fracture-like zones. These changes included lateral shifts up to 155 microm (average: 38.7 microm) in the position of orientation centers and appearance/disappearance of orientation centers when compared between different conditions. In general, these changes were three times more frequent between maps of 4/8 and 4/16 orientations than 8/16 orientations. It is concluded that orientation maps should be calculated from activity maps representing 8 or more stimulus orientations. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11352618     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  2 in total

1.  Bimodal modulation and continuous stimulation in optical imaging to map direction selectivity.

Authors:  M P Vanni; J Provost; C Casanova; F Lesage
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Orientation anisotropies in macaque visual areas.

Authors:  Chen Fang; Xingya Cai; Haidong D Lu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 12.779

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.