BACKGROUND: Contemporary cognitive models of auditory verbal hallucinations propose that they arise through defective self-monitoring. We used a paradigm that engages verbal self-monitoring to investigate this theory in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: Ten patients with auditory verbal hallucinations and delusions (hallucinators), eight patients with delusions but no hallucinations (non-hallucinators), and 20 non-psychiatric control subjects were tested. Participants read single adjectives aloud, under the following randomized conditions: reading aloud; reading aloud with acoustic distortion of their own voice; reading aloud with alien feedback (someone else's voice); and reading aloud with distorted alien feedback. Immediately after articulating each word, participants identified the source of the speech they heard ('self'/'other'/'unsure'), via a button press. Response choice and reaction time were recorded. RESULTS: When reading aloud with distorted feedback of their own voice, patients in both groups made more errors than controls; they either misidentified its source or were unsure. Hallucinators were particularly prone to misattributing their distorted voice to someone else, and were more likely to make errors when the words presented were derogatory. Both patient groups made faster decisions than controls about the source of distorted or alien speech, but faster responses were only associated with errors in the former condition. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired verbal self-monitoring was evident in both hallucinators and non-hallucinators. As both groups had delusions, the results suggest an association between delusions and impaired judgements about ambiguous sensory stimuli. The specific tendency of hallucinators to misattribute their distorted voice to someone else may reflect impaired awareness of internally generated verbal material.
BACKGROUND: Contemporary cognitive models of auditory verbal hallucinations propose that they arise through defective self-monitoring. We used a paradigm that engages verbal self-monitoring to investigate this theory in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: Ten patients with auditory verbal hallucinations and delusions (hallucinators), eight patients with delusions but no hallucinations (non-hallucinators), and 20 non-psychiatric control subjects were tested. Participants read single adjectives aloud, under the following randomized conditions: reading aloud; reading aloud with acoustic distortion of their own voice; reading aloud with alien feedback (someone else's voice); and reading aloud with distorted alien feedback. Immediately after articulating each word, participants identified the source of the speech they heard ('self'/'other'/'unsure'), via a button press. Response choice and reaction time were recorded. RESULTS: When reading aloud with distorted feedback of their own voice, patients in both groups made more errors than controls; they either misidentified its source or were unsure. Hallucinators were particularly prone to misattributing their distorted voice to someone else, and were more likely to make errors when the words presented were derogatory. Both patient groups made faster decisions than controls about the source of distorted or alien speech, but faster responses were only associated with errors in the former condition. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired verbal self-monitoring was evident in both hallucinators and non-hallucinators. As both groups had delusions, the results suggest an association between delusions and impaired judgements about ambiguous sensory stimuli. The specific tendency of hallucinators to misattribute their distorted voice to someone else may reflect impaired awareness of internally generated verbal material.
Authors: Elizabeth Kuipers; Philippa Garety; David Fowler; Daniel Freeman; Graham Dunn; Paul Bebbington Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2006-08-02 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Paul P Allen; Edson Amaro; Cynthia H Y Fu; Steven C R Williams; Michael Brammer; Louise C Johns; Philip K McGuire Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: John A Engh; Svein Friis; Astrid B Birkenaes; Halldóra Jónsdóttir; Ole Klungsøyr; Petter A Ringen; Carmen Simonsen; Anja Vaskinn; Stein Opjordsmoen; Ole A Andreassen Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Veena Kumari; Elena Antonova; Dominic Fannon; Emmanuelle R Peters; Dominic H Ffytche; Preethi Premkumar; Vinodkumar Raveendran; Christopher Andrew; Louise C Johns; Philip A McGuire; Steven Cr Williams; Elizabeth Kuipers Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2010-02-12 Impact factor: 3.558
Authors: Jonathan J Wisco; Gina Kuperberg; Dara Manoach; Brian T Quinn; Evelina Busa; Bruce Fischl; Stephan Heckers; A Gregory Sorensen Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2007-05-09 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Veena Kumari; Dominic Fannon; Dominic H Ffytche; Vinodkumar Raveendran; Elena Antonova; Preethi Premkumar; Michael A Cooke; Ananatha P P Anilkumar; Steven C R Williams; Christopher Andrew; Louise C Johns; Cynthia H Y Fu; Philip K McGuire; Elizabeth Kuipers Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2008-11-07 Impact factor: 9.306