Literature DB >> 11352132

ERP correlates of associative learning.

M Rose1, R Verleger, E Wascher.   

Abstract

We examined changes of event-related potentials (ERPs) while participants learned stimulus-to-stimulus relations in an S1-S2 task. The design allowed for separating processes of associative learning from nonspecific effects. Participants had to respond to S2 by a left or right key-press dependent on S2 identity (letter W or M). Preparation for S2 could be improved by using the associative information given by S1. The S1 was an arrow pointing to the left or right. In combination with its color, arrow direction was informative about location and identity of S2, but participants were not informed about the relevance of color. Arrows in two of the colors were fully predictive for the S2 whereas the third color gave no valid information. This third stimulus controlled for habituation and procedural learning. Six blocks with 200 trials each and all three S1 colors in random order were presented. Behavioral and ERP differences in each block between "learning" and control trials were used to identify processes of associative learning. Several effects of associative learning were identified indicating the involvement of specific stages of information processing: a continuous increase of P3 amplitude evoked by S1 was accompanied by a decrease of P3 evoked by S2. These changes reflected the modifications of stimulus weights for response selection and the strengthened association between the two stimulus complexes in the time course of learning. The related motor preparation benefited from learning too, expressed in a decrease of CNV amplitude and an increase of LRP amplitude. Finally a decrease of N1 amplitude evoked by S2 indicated the reduced need to allocate spatial attention to the S2 location according to the learned meaning of S1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11352132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  9 in total

1.  The nature of ecstasy-group related deficits in associative learning.

Authors:  Catharine Montgomery; John E Fisk; Russell Newcombe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Perceptual expertise and top-down expectation of musical notation engages the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Yetta Kwailing Wong; Cynthia Peng; Kristyn N Fratus; Geoffrey F Woodman; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Speech Timing Deficit of Stuttering: Evidence from Contingent Negative Variations.

Authors:  Ning Ning; Danling Peng; Xiangping Liu; Shuang Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Tracking the implicit acquisition of nonadjacent transitional probabilities by ERPs.

Authors:  Andrea Kóbor; Kata Horváth; Zsófia Kardos; Ádám Takács; Karolina Janacsek; Valéria Csépe; Dezso Nemeth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11

Review 5.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of statistical-sequential learning: what do event-related potentials tell us?

Authors:  Jerome Daltrozzo; Christopher M Conway
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Postural control and contingent negative variation during transient floor translation while standing with the ankle fixed.

Authors:  Vitalii Lytnev; Katsuo Fujiwara; Naoe Kiyota; Mariko Irei; Hiroshi Toyama; Chie Yaguchi
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.867

7.  Neural Correlates of Feedback Processing in Visuo-Tactile Crossmodal Paired-Associate Learning.

Authors:  Peng Gui; Jun Li; Yixuan Ku; Lei Li; Xiaojin Li; Xianzhen Zhou; Mark Bodner; Fred A Lenz; Xiao-Wei Dong; Liping Wang; Yong-Di Zhou
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  One Thing Leads to Another: Anticipating Visual Object Identity Based on Associative-Memory Templates.

Authors:  Sage E P Boettcher; Mark G Stokes; Anna C Nobre; Freek van Ede
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Learning and altering behaviours by reinforcement: neurocognitive differences between children and adults.

Authors:  E Shephard; G M Jackson; M J Groom
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 6.464

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.