Literature DB >> 11351376

Detecting social problems in cancer patients.

E P Wright1, P J Selby, A Gould, A Cull.   

Abstract

Diagnosis of and treatment for cancer may not only create physical and emotional difficulties for patients but may also have an impact on social aspects of patients' lives. Screening for social problems has not become part of routine oncology practice. This may be due to lack of a suitable questionnaire. This paper presents a psychometric analysis of the Problems Checklist with a view to assessing its usefulness as a screening tool for social problems in oncology. Evaluation was undertaken using data from an earlier study of 505 patients who completed the checklist. Frequency of endorsement, missing values, factor analysis and reliability and validity analysis of the summated scales were carried out. Missing data rates ranged from 4 to 18% over the 16 items. Fourteen items were well endorsed. Factor analysis produced a four-factor structure with components labelled daily living, relationships, economics and emotions. Reliability and validity tests endorsed the factor structure with the components on economics and emotions being particularly credible. Difficulties with relationships are harder to measure and results from the analysis suggest that this is an area that warrants further investigation. The checklist is a useful tool for highlighting problems. As a tool for screening for social problems it has some limitations. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11351376     DOI: 10.1002/pon.519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  6 in total

1.  Development and evaluation of an instrument to assess social difficulties in routine oncology practice.

Authors:  E P Wright; M Kiely; C Johnston; A B Smith; A Cull; P J Selby
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Assessing the social impact of cancer: a review of available tools.

Authors:  Barbara Muzzatti; M Antonietta Annunziata
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Towards the Implementation of Quality of Life Monitoring in Daily Clinical Routine: Methodological Issues and Clinical Implication.

Authors:  Johannes Giesinger; Georg Kemmler; Verena Meraner; Eva-Maria Gamper; Anne Oberguggenberger; Barbara Sperner-Unterweger; Bernhard Holzner
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  Patients' needs assessment in cancer care: a review of assessment tools.

Authors:  Alison Richardson; Jibby Medina; Vivienne Brown; John Sitzia
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Social problems in oncology.

Authors:  E P Wright; M A Kiely; P Lynch; A Cull; P J Selby
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-11-04       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Needs Based Biopsychosocial Distress Instrument for Cancer Patients (CANDI).

Authors:  Nazim Ercument Beyhun; Gamze Can; Ahmet Tiryaki; Serdar Karakullukcu; Bekir Bulut; Sehbal Yesilbas; Halil Kavgaci; Murat Topbas
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 0.611

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.