Literature DB >> 11350494

Comparison of IY81149 with omeprazole in rat reflux oesophagitis.

B J Kil1, I W Kim, C Y Shin, J H Jeong, C H Jun, S M Lee, D Y Kim, I H Huh, U D Sohn.   

Abstract

1. This study was aimed at evaluating the effects of IY81149[2-[[(4methoxy-3-methyl)-2-pyridinyl]methylsulfinyl]-5-(1H-pyrrol-1-yl)-1H-benzimidazole], a new proton pump inhibitor, on the development of the surgically induced reflux oesophagitis, on gastric secretion and on lipid peroxidation which is a marker of oxidative stress. Omeprazole was used as a reference drug. We furthermore investigated the influence of quercetin and desferrioxamine (DFO) on the development of the surgically induced reflux oesophagitis in rats on gastric secretion and on lipid peroxidation. 2. IY81149 and omeprazole significantly prevented the development of reflux oesophagitis and gastric secretion in a dose-dependent manner. The ED50 values of IY81149 for inhibition of oesophagitis and volume of gastric secretion were lower than of omeprazole (5.7 vs. 14.2 micromol, 15.3 vs. 24.0 micromol, respectively). IY81149 was also more potent in the acid output inhibition with an ED50 of 6.8 micromol compared with 20.8 micromol of omeprazole. 3. Malonyldialdehyde (MDA) content, the end product of lipid peroxidation, increased significantly in the oesophageal mucosa after the induction of reflux oesophagitis. IY81149 and omeprazole significantly and dose-dependently prevented lipid peroxidation. Quercetin (200 mg kg-1, p.o.) and DFO (800 mg kg-1, i.d.) significantly prevented the development of reflux oesophagitis and inhibited the lipid peroxidation independent of their actions on gastric secretion. 4. This result suggests that IY81149 is comparable with omeprazole in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11350494     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2680.2000.00192.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Auton Pharmacol        ISSN: 0144-1795


  5 in total

1.  Risk Factors for Esophageal Stricture in Grade 2b and 3a Corrosive Esophageal Injuries.

Authors:  Prasit Mahawongkajit; Prakitpunthu Tomtitchong; Nuttorn Boochangkool; Palin Limpavitayaporn; Amonpon Kanlerd; Chatchai Mingmalairak; Surajit Awsakulsutthi; Chittinad Havanond
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Intravenous ilaprazole is more potent than oral ilaprazole against gastric lesions in rats.

Authors:  Gang Yu; Xin-Qiang Lu; Rui-Bin Su; Ze-Hui Gong; He-Zhi Xie; Hai-Tang Hu; Xue-Mei Hou
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Efficacy of ilaprazole in the treatment of duodenal ulcers: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xi-Qing Ji; Jun-Feng Du; Gang Chen; Guang Chen; Bo Yu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Randomized, parallel, double-blind comparison of the ulcer-healing effects of ilaprazole and omeprazole in the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  Khek Yu Ho; Arlene Kuan; Felix Zaño; Khean Lee Goh; Varocha Mahachai; Dong Yeon Kim; Hwan Min Yoon
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Esophageal Acidification During Nocturnal Acid-breakthrough with Ilaprazole Versus Omeprazole in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Arun Karyampudi; Uday C Ghoshal; Rajan Singh; Abhai Verma; Asha Misra; Vivek A Saraswat
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-04-30       Impact factor: 4.924

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.