Literature DB >> 11350404

The role of serial transrectal ultrasonography in a 'watchful waiting' protocol for men with localized prostate cancer.

G Hruby1, R Choo, L Klotz, C Danjoux, J Murphy, G Deboer, G Morton, E Rakovitch, E Szumacher, N Fleshner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of serial 6-monthly transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) in a cohort of men with localized prostate cancer who consented to a programme of watchful waiting with selective delayed intervention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since November 1995, 180 men were accrued into an ongoing prospective study of watchful waiting with selective delayed intervention; 174 patients enrolled before 31 December 1999 comprised the cohort for the present study. The prospectively collected clinical data, including the TRUS reports, were reviewed systematically. Twenty-eight men met the arbitrarily predefined criteria of disease progression and required definitive treatment. The TRUS findings were scored as being consistent with the clinical scenario (i.e. clinical, biochemical or histological progression) if they reported a new or enlarging hypoechoic peripheral zone lesion, or a > or = 30% increase in overall prostate volume at the time of progression. In 136 men who had undergone two or more serial TRUS examinations the relationships between the rate of change of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and changes in both gland volume and the number of hypoechoic lesions were also examined.
RESULTS: The group of 28 men who progressed to require radical intervention underwent 83 TRUS examinations (median number per patient, three). Two men underwent TRUS only once at baseline because of progression within 6 months. Of these 28 men, only seven had changes on TRUS that were regarded as being consistent with progression; all seven consisted of the growth of an existing nodule or the appearance of a new nodule. In only one case was this accompanied by an increase of > or = 30% in gland volume. In the 136 men who underwent two or more serial TRUS examinations (median three, maximum nine), there was no correlation between the rate of change of PSA and changes in either gland volume or the number of peripheral zone hypoechoic lesions.
CONCLUSION: The use of serial TRUS in men with known but untreated prostate cancer is of limited value as a determinant of disease progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11350404     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02133.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  8 in total

1.  [Transrectal ultrasound of the prostate. Current status and prospects].

Authors:  M Zacharias; K V Jenderka; H Heynemann; P Fornara
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Role of transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of extracapsular prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lucio Dell'atti
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2014-01-30

Review 3.  Active surveillance as a practical strategy to differentiate lethal and non-lethal prostate cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Kakehi
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 4.  The role of diagnostic ultrasound imaging for patients with known prostate cancer within an active surveillance pathway: A systematic review.

Authors:  Pamela Parker; Maureen Twiddy; Paul Whybrow; Alan Rigby; Matthew Simms
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2021-04-15

5.  Local staging of prostate cancer: comparative accuracy of T2-weighted endorectal MR imaging and transrectal ultrasound.

Authors:  Adam J Jung; Fergus V Coakley; Katsuto Shinohara; Peter R Carroll; John Kurhanewicz; Janet E Cowan; Antonio C Westphalen
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 1.605

6.  Prostate cancer: is inapparent tumor at endorectal MR and MR spectroscopic imaging a favorable prognostic finding in patients who select active surveillance?

Authors:  Alvin R Cabrera; Fergus V Coakley; Antonio C Westphalen; Ying Lu; Shoujun Zhao; Katsuto Shinohara; Peter R Carroll; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Indications for and transitioning to secondary treatment while on active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Allison S Glass; Marc A Dall'Era
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-04

8.  Analysis of different tumor volume thresholds of insignificant prostate cancer and their implications for active surveillance patient selection and monitoring.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Lee; Kyo Chul Koo; Seung Hwan Lee; Koon Ho Rha; Young Deuk Choi; Sung Joon Hong; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2014-06-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.