AIMS: To investigate changes in left ventricular function in the first 6 months after acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. To assess clinical variables, associated with recovery of left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Changes in left ventricular function were studied in 600 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction, all treated with primary angioplasty. Left ventricular ejection fraction was measured by radionuclide ventriculography in survivors at day 4 and after 6 months. Patients with a recurrent myocardial infarction within the 6 months were excluded. RESULTS: Successful reperfusion (TIMI 3 flow) by primary angioplasty was achieved in 89% of patients. The mean ejection fraction at discharge was 43.7%+/-11.4, whereas the mean ejection fraction after 6 months was 46.3%+/-11.5 (P<0.01). During the 6 months, the mean relative improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction was 6%. An improvement in left ventricular function was observed in 48% of the patients; 25% of the patients had a decrease, whereas in the remaining patients there was no change. After univariate and multivariate analysis, an anterior infarction location, an ejection fraction at discharge < or =40% and single-vessel disease were significant predictors of left ventricular improvement during the 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: After acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty there was a significant recovery of left ventricular function during the first 6 months after the infarction. An anterior myocardial infarction, single-vessel coronary artery disease, and an initially depressed left ventricular function were independently associated with recovery of left ventricular function. Multivessel disease was associated with absence of functional recovery. Additional studies, investigating complete revascularization are needed, as this approach may potentially improve long-term left ventricular function. Copyright 2001 The European Society of Cardiology.
AIMS: To investigate changes in left ventricular function in the first 6 months after acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. To assess clinical variables, associated with recovery of left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Changes in left ventricular function were studied in 600 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction, all treated with primary angioplasty. Left ventricular ejection fraction was measured by radionuclide ventriculography in survivors at day 4 and after 6 months. Patients with a recurrent myocardial infarction within the 6 months were excluded. RESULTS: Successful reperfusion (TIMI 3 flow) by primary angioplasty was achieved in 89% of patients. The mean ejection fraction at discharge was 43.7%+/-11.4, whereas the mean ejection fraction after 6 months was 46.3%+/-11.5 (P<0.01). During the 6 months, the mean relative improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction was 6%. An improvement in left ventricular function was observed in 48% of the patients; 25% of the patients had a decrease, whereas in the remaining patients there was no change. After univariate and multivariate analysis, an anterior infarction location, an ejection fraction at discharge < or =40% and single-vessel disease were significant predictors of left ventricular improvement during the 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: After acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty there was a significant recovery of left ventricular function during the first 6 months after the infarction. An anterior myocardial infarction, single-vessel coronary artery disease, and an initially depressed left ventricular function were independently associated with recovery of left ventricular function. Multivessel disease was associated with absence of functional recovery. Additional studies, investigating complete revascularization are needed, as this approach may potentially improve long-term left ventricular function. Copyright 2001 The European Society of Cardiology.
Authors: Wanda Y Wu; David W Biery; Avinainder Singh; Sanjay Divakaran; Adam N Berman; Gloria Ayuba; Ersilia M DeFilippis; Khurram Nasir; James L Januzzi; Marcelo F Di Carli; Deepak L Bhatt; Ron Blankstein Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: R J van der Schaaf; J R Timmer; J P Ottervanger; J C A Hoorntje; M-J de Boer; H Suryapranata; F Zijlstra; J-H E Dambrink Journal: Heart Date: 2006-04-27 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: J P S Henriques; F Zijlstra; A W J van 't Hof; M-J de Boer; J-H E Dambrink; A T M Gosselink; J C A Hoorntje; J P Ottervanger; H Suryapranata Journal: Heart Date: 2005-04-14 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Mustafa Umut Somuncu; Fatih Pasa Tatar; Belma Kalayci; Ahmet Avci; Naile Eris Gudul; Begum Uygur; Ali Riza Demir; Murat Can Journal: Acta Cardiol Sin Date: 2021-09 Impact factor: 2.672
Authors: René J van der Schaaf; Bimmer E Claessen; Loes P Hoebers; Niels J Verouden; Jacques J Koolen; Maarten J Suttorp; Emanuele Barbato; Matthijs Bax; Bradley H Strauss; Göran K Olivecrona; Vegard Tuseth; Dietmar Glogar; Truls Råmunddal; Jan G Tijssen; Jan J Piek; José P S Henriques Journal: Trials Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Iwan C C van der Horst; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Arnoud W J van 't Hof; Stoffer Reiffers; Kor Miedema; Jan C A Hoorntje; Jan-Henk E Dambrink; A T Marcel Gosselink; Maarten W N Nijsten; Harry Suryapranata; Menko-Jan de Boer; Felix Zijlstra Journal: BMC Med Date: 2005-06-02 Impact factor: 8.775