AIM: Interval hypoxic training was proposed as a technique for adapting hypoxia of various origins. Its effects on the hypoxic ventilatory response and on cardiovascular autonomic control are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We recorded ventilation, end-tidal oxygen (PETO2) and carbon dioxide partial pressures, RR interval and blood pressure during progressive isocapnic hypoxia, before and after 14 days of: (a) interval hypoxic training (three to four periods of 7 min progressive hypoxia in 1 h, each day) in 12 healthy men (training group); (b) breathing into a spirometer by six age-matched male controls. The hypoxic ventilatory response was estimated by the hyperbolic relationship between PETO2 and ventilation (shape factor A). Spectral analysis was used to characterize low- (mainly sympathetic) and high-frequency (vagal) cardiovascular fluctuations. Shape factor A was increased in the interval hypoxic training group from 268+/-59 to 984+/-196 l x mmHg(-1)(P<0.003), but not in the control group (from 525+/-180 to 808+/-245 l x mmHg(-1), P=ns). Before interval hypoxic training, progressive hypoxia decreased, to a similar extent in both groups, mean RR, RR variability and high-frequency power. After interval hypoxic training, RR still decreased significantly, but the decrease in RR variability and high-frequency power was no longer significant in the training group. No significant changes were observed in blood pressure fluctuations. No changes were observed in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Two weeks of interval hypoxic training increased the hypoxic ventilatory response, in association with reduced vagal withdrawal during progressive hypoxia. Copyright 2001 The European Society of Cardiology.
RCT Entities:
AIM: Interval hypoxic training was proposed as a technique for adapting hypoxia of various origins. Its effects on the hypoxic ventilatory response and on cardiovascular autonomic control are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We recorded ventilation, end-tidal oxygen (PETO2) and carbon dioxide partial pressures, RR interval and blood pressure during progressive isocapnic hypoxia, before and after 14 days of: (a) interval hypoxic training (three to four periods of 7 min progressive hypoxia in 1 h, each day) in 12 healthy men (training group); (b) breathing into a spirometer by six age-matched male controls. The hypoxic ventilatory response was estimated by the hyperbolic relationship between PETO2 and ventilation (shape factor A). Spectral analysis was used to characterize low- (mainly sympathetic) and high-frequency (vagal) cardiovascular fluctuations. Shape factor A was increased in the interval hypoxic training group from 268+/-59 to 984+/-196 l x mmHg(-1)(P<0.003), but not in the control group (from 525+/-180 to 808+/-245 l x mmHg(-1), P=ns). Before interval hypoxic training, progressive hypoxia decreased, to a similar extent in both groups, mean RR, RR variability and high-frequency power. After interval hypoxic training, RR still decreased significantly, but the decrease in RR variability and high-frequency power was no longer significant in the training group. No significant changes were observed in blood pressure fluctuations. No changes were observed in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Two weeks of interval hypoxic training increased the hypoxic ventilatory response, in association with reduced vagal withdrawal during progressive hypoxia. Copyright 2001 The European Society of Cardiology.
Authors: Jules M Janssen Daalen; Marjan J Meinders; Federica Giardina; Kit C B Roes; Bas C Stunnenberg; Soania Mathur; Philip N Ainslie; Dick H J Thijssen; Bastiaan R Bloem Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 2.903
Authors: Martin Burtscher; Hannes Gatterer; Christoph Szubski; Emanuela Pierantozzi; Martin Faulhaber Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2009-08-18 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Priyanka Dhar; Vijay K Sharma; Kalpana B Hota; Saroj K Das; Sunil K Hota; Ravi B Srivastava; Shashi B Singh Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Fang Cui; Lu Gao; Fang Yuan; Ze-Fei Dong; Zhao-Nian Zhou; David D Kline; Yi Zhang; De-Pei Li Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-27 Impact factor: 3.240