OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of a risk-based intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis strategy for the prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease. STUDY DESIGN: Cases and controls were selected from infants born to women with one or more risk factors: preterm labor or rupture of membranes, prolonged rupture of membranes (>18 hours), fever during labor, or previous child with group B streptococcal disease. Cases were matched with controls by birth hospital and gestational age. Data abstracted from medical records were analyzed to estimate the effectiveness of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 109 cases and 207 controls. Nineteen (17%) case versus 69 (33%) control mothers received an acceptable regimen of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. In adjusted analyses, the effectiveness of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis was 86% (95% confidence interval, 66%-94%). When the first dose of antibiotics was given > or =2 hours before delivery, the effectiveness increased to 89% (95% confidence interval, 70%-96%); when it was given within 2 hours of delivery, the effectiveness was 71% (95% confidence interval, -8%-92%). Effectiveness was lowest in mothers with intrapartum fever (72%, 95% confidence interval, -9%-93%). On the basis of a 70% prevalence of maternal risk factors expected among cases in the absence of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, we estimate that the risk-based strategy could reduce early-onset group B streptococcal disease by 60%. CONCLUSIONS: The risk-based approach to intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis is effective in preventing early-onset group B streptococcal disease. To achieve the maximum preventive effect, the first dose of antibiotics should be administered at least 2 hours before delivery.
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of a risk-based intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis strategy for the prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease. STUDY DESIGN: Cases and controls were selected from infants born to women with one or more risk factors: preterm labor or rupture of membranes, prolonged rupture of membranes (>18 hours), fever during labor, or previous child with group B streptococcal disease. Cases were matched with controls by birth hospital and gestational age. Data abstracted from medical records were analyzed to estimate the effectiveness of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 109 cases and 207 controls. Nineteen (17%) case versus 69 (33%) control mothers received an acceptable regimen of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. In adjusted analyses, the effectiveness of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis was 86% (95% confidence interval, 66%-94%). When the first dose of antibiotics was given > or =2 hours before delivery, the effectiveness increased to 89% (95% confidence interval, 70%-96%); when it was given within 2 hours of delivery, the effectiveness was 71% (95% confidence interval, -8%-92%). Effectiveness was lowest in mothers with intrapartum fever (72%, 95% confidence interval, -9%-93%). On the basis of a 70% prevalence of maternal risk factors expected among cases in the absence of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, we estimate that the risk-based strategy could reduce early-onset group B streptococcal disease by 60%. CONCLUSIONS: The risk-based approach to intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis is effective in preventing early-onset group B streptococcal disease. To achieve the maximum preventive effect, the first dose of antibiotics should be administered at least 2 hours before delivery.
Authors: William P Goins; Thomas R Talbot; William Schaffner; Kathryn M Edwards; Allen S Craig; Stephanie J Schrag; Melissa K Van Dyke; Marie R Griffin Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Kartik K Venkatesh; Catherine J Vladutiu; Robert A Strauss; John M Thorp; Jeffrey S A Stringer; David M Stamilio; Brenna L Hughes; Sarah Dotters-Katz Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2020-05-04 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Debra L Wohl; William J Curry; Dave Mauger; Jennifer Miller; Kaitlyn Tyrie Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2015 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Jonathan M Wortham; Nellie I Hansen; Stephanie J Schrag; Ellen Hale; Krisa Van Meurs; Pablo J Sánchez; Joseph B Cantey; Roger Faix; Brenda Poindexter; Ronald Goldberg; Matthew Bizzarro; Ivan Frantz; Abhik Das; William E Benitz; Andi L Shane; Rosemary Higgins; Barbara J Stoll Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Blake W Buchan; Matthew L Faron; DeAnna Fuller; Thomas E Davis; Donna Mayne; Nathan A Ledeboer Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Gaurav Kwatra; Shabir A Madhi; Clare L Cutland; Eckhart J Buchmann; Peter V Adrian Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 5.948