Literature DB >> 11348848

The Potential of F-18-FDG PET in Breast Cancer. Detection of Primary Lesions, Axillary Lymph Node Metastases, or Distant Metastases.

K F. Hubner1, G T. Smith, J A. Thie, J L. Bell, H S. Nelson, W T. Hanna.   

Abstract

This retrospective study was done to evaluate the utility of 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (F-18-FDG PET) in identifying primary and recurrent breast cancer and lymph node metastases. One hundred whole-body PET scans of 87 patients were reviewed. PET results obtained with F-18-FDG and an ECAT/EXACT-921 or an ECAT-931 (Siemens/CTI) were based on visual interpretation, or standardized uptake values (SUVs), related to histology and also compared to computerized tomography (CT) and mammography results. The sensitivity for PET in detecting primary (N = 35 studies) and recurrent breast cancer (N = 65 studies) was 96% and 85% with a specificity of 91% and 73%. The sensitivity for lymph node metastases at the time of initial diagnosis was 100% with a specificity of 100%. Quantitative SUV information did not improve the accuracy of F-18-FDG PET in identifying primary breast cancers. The results suggest that whole-body PET is useful in detecting recurrence or metastases, may be useful in detecting lymph node metastases prior to initial axillary lymph node dissection, but is less sensitive in excluding axillary lymph nodes metastases later in the course of the disease.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 11348848     DOI: 10.1016/s1095-0397(00)00050-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Positron Imaging        ISSN: 1095-0397


  4 in total

Review 1.  Use of tomographic nuclear medicine procedures, SPECT and pinhole SPECT, with cationic lipophilic radiotracers for the evaluation of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Giuseppe Madeddu; Angela Spanu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  The role of positron emission tomographic imaging in breast cancer.

Authors:  Michelle D McDonough; Elizabeth R DePeri; Betty A Mincey
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  FDG PET and tumour markers in the diagnosis of recurrent and metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Wulf Siggelkow; Werner Rath; Udalrich Buell; Michael Zimny
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  PET/CT in oncology: for which tumours is it the reference standard?

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.