Literature DB >> 11348682

Spatial distribution and behaviour of laying hens housed in an alternative system.

C E. Channing1, B O. Hughes, A W. Walker.   

Abstract

The spatial distribution and behaviour of perchery housed laying hens were compared at a constant stocking density (18.5 birds/m(2)) in eight pens with colonies of five different sizes (323 birds (N=1), 374 birds (N=2), 431 birds (N=2), 572 birds (N=1) and 912 birds (N=2)). The birds were placed in the perchery when they were 12 weeks old. Observations began when they were 26 weeks old and continued at 8 week intervals until 61 weeks of age. Colony size did not appear to affect the spatial distribution of birds, but more standing behaviour and less feeding behaviour were observed in the smallest and largest colony sizes. Older birds spent more time on the floor areas and less time on perches. Young birds (26-28 weeks) spent more time feeding, foraging, drinking and preening, and less time standing idle than older birds. In the afternoons, there were fewer birds on the perches and more on the floor levels, corresponding with less time spent resting and more time spent performing active behaviours. Birds did not distribute themselves evenly throughout their pens: within specific areas of pens densities varied between 9 and 41 birds/m(2). This variation, which reflects the flux of birds from one part of the pen to another, was greatest for the larger colony sizes, and may have adverse implications for welfare in terms of crowding and hysteria.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11348682     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(00)00206-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci        ISSN: 0168-1591            Impact factor:   2.448


  11 in total

1.  Influence of genetic strain and access to litter on spatial distribution of 4 strains of laying hens in an aviary system.

Authors:  A B A Ali; D L M Campbell; D M Karcher; J M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Pecking Behavior in Conventional Layer Hybrids and Dual-Purpose Hens Throughout the Laying Period.

Authors:  Lorena Rieke; Birgit Spindler; Isabel Zylka; Nicole Kemper; Mona Franziska Giersberg
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-04-23

3.  Space use by 4 strains of laying hens to perch, wing flap, dust bathe, stand and lie down.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Riddle; Ahmed B A Ali; Dana L M Campbell; Janice M Siegford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The ability of laying pullets to negotiate two ramp designs as measured by bird preference and behaviour.

Authors:  Isabelle C Pettersson; Claire A Weeks; Kate I Norman; Christine J Nicol
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  The effects of 2 genetic lines on spatial distribution and use and preference of perch and nest area in an aviary system.

Authors:  S Purdum; P Eusebio; K Hanford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Nest use and patterns of egg laying and damage by 4 strains of laying hens in an aviary system.

Authors:  S Villanueva; A B A Ali; D L M Campbell; J M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Laying hens in aviaries with different litter substrates: Behavior across the flock cycle and feather lipid content.

Authors:  D L M Campbell; A B A Ali; D M Karcher; J M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Adaptational changes of behaviors in hens introduced to a multi-tier system.

Authors:  Si Nae Cheon; Yang-Ho Choi; Kyu-Hyun Park; Jun Yeob Lee; Jung Hwan Jeon
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2020-03-31

9.  Dust bathing in laying hens: strain, proximity to, and number of conspecifics matter.

Authors:  Tessa C Grebey; Ahmed B A Ali; Janice C Swanson; Tina M Widowski; Janice M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  A risk assessment of health, production, and resource occupancy for 4 laying hen strains across the lay cycle in a commercial-style aviary system.

Authors:  Ahmed B A Ali; Dana L M Campbell; Janice M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.