Literature DB >> 11348412

Distress, coping, and social support among rural women recently diagnosed with primary breast cancer.

C Koopman1, K Angell, J M Turner-Cobb, M A Kreshka, P Donnelly, R McCoy, A Turkseven, K Graddy, J Giese-Davis, D Spiegel.   

Abstract

This study examined distress, coping, and group support among a sample of rural women who had been recently diagnosed with breast cancer. We recruited 100 women who had been diagnosed with primary breast cancer at one of two time points in their medical treatment: either within a window up to 3 months after their diagnosis of breast cancer, or within 6 months after completing medical treatment for breast cancer. Their mean age was 58.6 years (SD = 11.6), and 90% were of white/European American ethnicity. Women completed a battery of demographic and psychosocial measures prior to being randomized into a psychoeducational intervention study, and then again 3 months later at a follow-up assessment. The focus of this article is on the women's self-reported psychosocial status at baseline. Many of the women experienced considerable traumatic stress regarding their breast cancer. However, this distress was not reflected in a standard measure of mood disturbance that is frequently used in intervention research (the Profile of Mood States). The average woman considered her diagnosis of breast cancer to be among the four most stressful life events that she had ever experienced. Also, women on average reported a high level of helplessness/hopelessness in coping with their cancer. On average, women felt that they "often" (but not "very often") received instrumental assistance, emotional support, and informational support. Women varied considerably in which kind of social group provided them with the most support, with as many reporting that they found the greatest support in spiritual/church groups or within their family units as with breast or general cancer groups. These results suggest that among these rural women with breast cancer, distress with the diagnosis of breast cancer must be carefully assessed, as women who are highly distressed about their breast cancer may not report general mood disturbance. Furthermore, the kinds of groups that rural women with breast cancer experience as most supportive need to be identified so that psychosocial interventions can be matched to breast cancer patients' individual needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11348412     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2001.007001025.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  16 in total

Review 1.  Psychosocial well-being and supportive care needs of cancer patients living in urban and rural/regional areas: a systematic review.

Authors:  Phyllis N Butow; Fiona Phillips; Janine Schweder; Kate White; Craig Underhill; David Goldstein
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  'My husband would not help me, so I was driving over there': older rural women experiencing breast cancer with a non-supportive intimate partner.

Authors:  E M Sawin
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 1.759

3.  Use of cancer-specific mental health resources-is there an urban-rural divide?

Authors:  Anna Beraldi; Ene Kukk; Alexandra Nest; Gabriele Schubert-Fritschle; Jutta Engel; Pia Heußner; Peter Herschbach
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Psychosocial intervention for rural women with breast cancer: The Sierra-Stanford Partnership.

Authors:  Karyn L Angell; Mary Anne Kreshka; Rebecca McCoy; Patricia Donnelly; Julie M Turner-Cobb; Kathy Graddy; Helena C Kraemer; Cheryl Koopman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  A New Take on a Resource-Based Model of Quality of Life in Hemato-Oncological Patients: Demographic, Personal, and Social Factors.

Authors:  Leehu Zysberg; Sharon Hai; Najib Dally
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2019-12

6.  Does rurality affect quality of life following treatment for breast cancer?

Authors:  Stephanie A Reid-Arndt; Cathy R Cox
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Psychosocial service use: a qualitative exploration from the perspective of rural Australian cancer patients.

Authors:  Kate Gunn; Deborah Turnbull; J Lindsay McWha; Matthew Davies; Ian Olver
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  A consultation with Canadian rural women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ross E Gray; Pamela James; Jackie Manthorne; Judy Gould; Margaret I Fitch
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Providing supportive care to cancer patients: a study on inter-organizational relationships.

Authors:  Kevin Brazil; Daryl Bainbridge; Jonathan Sussman; Tim Whelan; Mary Ann O'Brien; Nancy Pyette
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 5.120

Review 10.  The patient experience.

Authors:  Nadia Harbeck; Renate Haidinger
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.