Literature DB >> 11348318

Tc-99m Sestamibi Scintimammography for the Evaluation of Breast Masses in Patients with Radiographically Dense Breasts.

John A. Cutrone1, Iraj Khalkhali, Lisa S. Yospur, Linda Diggles, Irving Weinberg, Edward M. Pong, Jorge Tolmos, M. Perla Vargas, Hernan I. Vargas.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of technetium-99m sestamibi (MIBI) scintimammography for the diagnosis of breast cancer in patients with palpable breast masses that cannot be adequately evaluated by mammography due to the presence of radiographically dense breasts. At 5 minutes after intravenous injection of MIBI, scintimammograms were obtained in 80 patients who had grade 3 or 4 glandular density on mammograms and a palpable breast mass. Excisional biopsy or FNA biopsy was obtained in 68 lesions in 67 patients. Scintimammography (22 true positive, 4 false positive, 41 true negative, 1 false negative) resulted in a sensitivity of 95.6%, specificity 91.1%, positive predictive value 84.6%, and negative predictive value 97.6%. Mammography (19 true positive, 21 false positive, 24 true negative, 4 false negative) resulted in a sensitivity of 73.9%, specificity 53.3%, positive predictive value 44.7%, and negative predictive value 80%. MIBI scintimammography has a higher sensitivity and specificity than mammography in patients with radiographically dense breasts. It is useful as an adjunct to mammography in those patients with radiographically dense breasts for the characterization of palpable masses. Although sensitivity of mammography in this cohort was high, its specificity was significantly lower than scintimammography. If validated in prospective studies it could provide a safe way of avoiding a breast biopsy in patients with benign findings on clinical exam, mammography, and needle aspiration cytology.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 11348318     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.1999.98086.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  7 in total

1.  [Functional and molecular imaging of breast tumors].

Authors:  K Pinker; P Brader; G Karanikas; K El-Rabadi; W Bogner; S Gruber; M Reisegger; S Trattnig; T H Helbich
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer - Potential Future Aspects.

Authors:  Katja Pinker; Wolfgang Bogner; Stephan Gruber; Peter Brader; Siegfried Trattnig; Georgios Karanikas; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  [Molecular breast imaging. An update].

Authors:  K Pinker; T H Helbich; H Magometschnigg; B Fueger; P Baltzer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Scintimammography as an adjunctive breast imaging technology: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2007-04-01

5.  Breast scintigraphy today: indications and limitations.

Authors:  Orazio Schillaci; John R Buscombe
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Accuracy of (99m)Tc-sestamibi scintimammography for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Sonia Marta Moriguchi; Laurival Antônio DE Luca; Beatriz Lotufo Griva; Kátia Hiromoto Koga; Eduardo Tinois DA Silva; Heloisa DE Luca Vespoli; Gilberto Uemura
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Validity of breast-specific gamma imaging for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound.

Authors:  Min Jeng Cho; Jung-Hyun Yang; Yeong Beom Yu; Kyoung Sik Park; Hyun Woo Chung; Young So; Nami Choi; Mi Young Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 1.859

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.