Literature DB >> 11348091

Arsenate and arsenite removal by zerovalent iron: kinetics, redox transformation, and implications for in situ groundwater remediation.

C Su1, R W Puls.   

Abstract

Batch tests were performed utilizing four zerovalent iron (Fe0) filings (Fisher, Peerless, Master Builders, and Aldrich) to remove As(V) and As(III) from water. One gram of metal was reacted headspace-free at 23 degrees C for up to 5 days in the dark with 41.5 mL of 2 mg L(-1) As(V), or As(III) or As(V) + As(III) (1:1) in 0.01 M NaCl. Arsenic removal on a mass basis followed the order: Fisher > Peerless Master Builders > Aldrich; whereas, on a surface area basis the order became: Fisher > Aldrich > Peerless Master Builders. Arsenic concentration decreased exponentially with time, and was below 0.01 mg L(-1) in 4 days with the exception of Aldrich Fe0. More As(III) was sorbed than As(V) by Peerless Fe0 in the initial As concentration range between 2 and 100 mg L(-1). No As(III) was detected by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) on Peerless Fe0 at 5 days when As(V) was the initial arsenic species in the solution. As(III) was detected by XPS at 30 and 60 days present on Peerless Fe0, when As(V) was the initial arsenic species in the solution. Likewise, As(V) was found on Peerless Fe0 when As(II) was added to the solution. A steady distribution of As(V) (73-76%) and As(III) (22-25%) was achieved at 30 and 60 days on the Peerless Fe0 when either As(V) or As(III) was the initial added species. The presence of both reducing species (Fe0 and Fe2+) and an oxidizing species (MnO2) in Peerless Fe0 is probably responsible for the coexistence of both As(V) and As(III) on Fe0 surfaces. The desorption of As(V) and As(III) by phosphate extraction decreased as the residence time of interaction between the sorbents and arsenic increased from 1 to 60 days. The results suggest that both As(V) and As(III) formed stronger surface complexes or migrated further inside the interior of the sorbent with increasing time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11348091     DOI: 10.1021/es001607i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  14 in total

1.  Removing arsenic from groundwater in Cambodia using high performance iron adsorbent.

Authors:  Y Kang; R Takeda; A Nada; L Thavarith; S Tang; K Nuki; K Sakurai
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Effective adsorbent for arsenic removal: core/shell structural nano zero-valent iron/manganese oxide.

Authors:  Trung Huu Bui; Choonsoo Kim; Sung Pil Hong; Jeyong Yoon
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Recycling of nickel smelter slag for arsenic remediation--an experimental study.

Authors:  Saidur Rahman Chowdhury; Ernest K Yanful; Allen R Pratt
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  A sorption kinetics model for arsenic adsorption to magnetite nanoparticles.

Authors:  Heather J Shipley; Sujin Yean; Amy T Kan; Mason B Tomson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Enhanced selective removal of arsenic(V) using a hybrid nanoscale zirconium molybdate embedded anion exchange resin.

Authors:  Trung Huu Bui; Sung Pil Hong; Jeyong Yoon
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Characterizing the impact of MnO2 addition on the efficiency of Fe0/H2O systems.

Authors:  Viet Cao; Ghinwa Alyoussef; Nadège Gatcha-Bandjun; Willis Gwenzi; Chicgoua Noubactep
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  In situ arsenic immobilisation for coastal aquifers using stimulated iron cycling: Lab-based viability assessment.

Authors:  Alyssa Barron; Jing Sun; Stefania Passaretti; Chiara Sbarbati; Maurizio Barbieri; Nicolò Colombani; James Jamieson; Benjamin C Bostick; Yan Zheng; Micòl Mastrocicco; Marco Petitta; Henning Prommer
Journal:  Appl Geochem       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.524

8.  Evaluation on the Nanoscale Zero Valent Iron Based Microbial Denitrification for Nitrate Removal from Groundwater.

Authors:  Lai Peng; Yiwen Liu; Shu-Hong Gao; Xueming Chen; Pei Xin; Xiaohu Dai; Bing-Jie Ni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Arsenic removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto iron oxide/activated carbon magnetic composite.

Authors:  Shuhua Yao; Ziru Liu; Zhongliang Shi
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2014-03-06

10.  A highly efficient degradation mechanism of methyl orange using Fe-based metallic glass powders.

Authors:  Shenghui Xie; Ping Huang; Jamie J Kruzic; Xierong Zeng; Haixia Qian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.