Literature DB >> 11347866

Differentiation of deception using pupillary responses as an index of cognitive processing.

D P Dionisio1, E Granholm, W A Hillix, W F Perrine.   

Abstract

The deception literature has predominantly focused on detection of guilty individuals using electrodermal measures. Little research has examined other psychophysiological measures or the mechanisms underlying deception. Therefore, the present study examined pupillary responses in a differentiation-of-deception paradigm. Twenty-four undergraduate participants answered the same questions twice, once truthfully and once deceptively, while pupillary responses were recorded. Questions were based on recently learned (episodic) information from scenarios or on general (semantic) knowledge from long-term memory. Task-evoked pupil dilation was significantly greater when participants confabulated responses than when they told the truth for both episodic and semantic memory questions. Previous research has demonstrated that pupil size increases with increased cognitive processing load. The present study suggested that generating deceptive recall was associated with increased pupil size and required greater cognitive processing than truthful recall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11347866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  14 in total

1.  EALab (Eye Activity Lab): a MATLAB Toolbox for Variable Extraction, Multivariate Analysis and Classification of Eye-Movement Data.

Authors:  Javier Andreu-Perez; Celine Solnais; Kumuthan Sriskandarajah
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2016-01

2.  Lying in a native and foreign language.

Authors:  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia; Albert Costa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

3.  Lyin' eyes: ocular-motor measures of reading reveal deception.

Authors:  Anne E Cook; Douglas J Hacker; Andrea K Webb; Dahvyn Osher; Sean D Kristjansson; Dan J Woltz; John C Kircher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2012-04-30

4.  Markers of deception in italian speech.

Authors:  Katelyn Spence; Gina Villar; Joanne Arciuli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-30

5.  Teleological reasoning in 4-month-old infants: pupil dilations and contextual constraints.

Authors:  Gustaf Gredebäck; Annika Melinder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Detecting simulated versus bona fide traumatic brain injury using pupillometry.

Authors:  Sarah D Patrick; Lisa J Rapport; Robert J Kanser; Robin A Hanks; Jesse R Bashem
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.424

7.  Advancing lie detection by inducing cognitive load on liars: a review of relevant theories and techniques guided by lessons from polygraph-based approaches.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walczyk; Frank P Igou; Alexa P Dixon; Talar Tcholakian
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-01

8.  Combining blink, pupil, and response time measures in a concealed knowledge test.

Authors:  Travis L Seymour; Christopher A Baker; Joshua T Gaunt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-04

9.  Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting.

Authors:  Sabine Ströfer; Elze G Ufkes; Matthijs L Noordzij; Ellen Giebels
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2016-09

Review 10.  The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge.

Authors:  Adriana A Zekveld; Thomas Koelewijn; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.