BACKGROUND: There is a growing body of evidence from animal and in vitro studies for the existence of reperfusion injury after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but the patient data are limited. HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to examine the plasma thrombomodulin (TM) levels as a marker of endothelial injury and to investigate the effect of successful reperfusion on these levels. METHODS: The study included 32 patients who had a first episode of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and received intravenous streptokinase therapy. RESULTS: Thrombomodulin levels increased significantly at 60 min after thrombolysis compared with the levels before thrombolytic therapy (0 min) in 21 (66%) patients who had successful reperfusion (49.09 +/- 10.51 vs. 25.76 +/- 5.55 ng/ml, p < 0.001). There was no difference between the TM levels at 0 and at 60 min of thrombolysis in the remaining 11 (34%) patients who could not achieve reperfusion (27.81 +/- 6.32 vs. 28.72 +/- 7.28 ng/ml, p = 0.35). CONCLUSION: There was a significant increase in TM levels at 60 min after thrombolysis in a group of patients with AMI who achieved successful reperfusion; this increase may have been caused by the activation/injury of endothelial cells. Data also suggest that the increment in TM levels may be predictive of the potential success of thrombolytic therapy.
BACKGROUND: There is a growing body of evidence from animal and in vitro studies for the existence of reperfusion injury after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but the patient data are limited. HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to examine the plasma thrombomodulin (TM) levels as a marker of endothelial injury and to investigate the effect of successful reperfusion on these levels. METHODS: The study included 32 patients who had a first episode of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and received intravenous streptokinase therapy. RESULTS:Thrombomodulin levels increased significantly at 60 min after thrombolysis compared with the levels before thrombolytic therapy (0 min) in 21 (66%) patients who had successful reperfusion (49.09 +/- 10.51 vs. 25.76 +/- 5.55 ng/ml, p < 0.001). There was no difference between the TM levels at 0 and at 60 min of thrombolysis in the remaining 11 (34%) patients who could not achieve reperfusion (27.81 +/- 6.32 vs. 28.72 +/- 7.28 ng/ml, p = 0.35). CONCLUSION: There was a significant increase in TM levels at 60 min after thrombolysis in a group of patients with AMI who achieved successful reperfusion; this increase may have been caused by the activation/injury of endothelial cells. Data also suggest that the increment in TM levels may be predictive of the potential success of thrombolytic therapy.
Authors: K Hoshi; T Inoue; H Kakoi; T Satoh; H Yamaguchi; Y Sakai; S Morooka; Y Takabatake Journal: Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis Date: 1995-04 Impact factor: 1.276