AIMS: In selected patients with colorectal liver metastases, hepatic resection offers an opportunity for cure, with a 25-38% 5-year survival rate. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether patient selection could be improved with pre-operative whole-body 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scan. METHODS: Ninety-one consecutive patients were considered to be eligible for liver resection after investigation with conventional diagnostic methods (CDM). In all these patients a whole-body PET scan with FDG was performed prior to surgery. Follow-up was complete with a mean of 23 months (2 weeks-92 months). All PET images were reviewed blinded to intraoperative and follow-up data. RESULTS: PET confirmed liver metastases in 90 (99%) patients, while it provided additional information in 10 (11%) patients, i.e., seven intra-abdominal, and three extra-abdominal. PET falsely upstaged six (6.6%) patients in whom malignancy was excluded by additional investigation, at the time of surgery, or during follow-up. PET falsely understaged seven (7.7%) patients with small intra-abdominal lesions. CONCLUSION: In patients with potentially curable colorectal liver metastases according to conventional diagnostic methods, whole-body FDG-PET can be considered as a complementary examination in order to further select patients for potentially curative liver resection, and to optimize therapeutic strategy.
AIMS: In selected patients with colorectal liver metastases, hepatic resection offers an opportunity for cure, with a 25-38% 5-year survival rate. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether patient selection could be improved with pre-operative whole-body 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scan. METHODS: Ninety-one consecutive patients were considered to be eligible for liver resection after investigation with conventional diagnostic methods (CDM). In all these patients a whole-body PET scan with FDG was performed prior to surgery. Follow-up was complete with a mean of 23 months (2 weeks-92 months). All PET images were reviewed blinded to intraoperative and follow-up data. RESULTS: PET confirmed liver metastases in 90 (99%) patients, while it provided additional information in 10 (11%) patients, i.e., seven intra-abdominal, and three extra-abdominal. PET falsely upstaged six (6.6%) patients in whom malignancy was excluded by additional investigation, at the time of surgery, or during follow-up. PET falsely understaged seven (7.7%) patients with small intra-abdominal lesions. CONCLUSION: In patients with potentially curable colorectal liver metastases according to conventional diagnostic methods, whole-body FDG-PET can be considered as a complementary examination in order to further select patients for potentially curative liver resection, and to optimize therapeutic strategy.
Authors: V O Chan; J P Das; J F Gerstenmaier; J Geoghegan; R G Gibney; C D Collins; S J Skehan; D E Malone Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2012-03-17 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Markus Selzner; Thomas F Hany; Peer Wildbrett; Lucas McCormack; Zakiyah Kadry; Pierre-Alain Clavien Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Chris M Schüssler-Fiorenza; David M Mahvi; John Niederhuber; Layton F Rikkers; Sharon M Weber Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Monique Maas; Iris J G Rutten; Patty J Nelemans; Doenja M J Lambregts; Vincent C Cappendijk; Geerard L Beets; Regina G H Beets-Tan Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-04-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Rafke Schoffelen; Winette Ta van der Graaf; Robert M Sharkey; Gerben M Franssen; William J McBride; Chien-Hsing Chang; Peter Laverman; David M Goldenberg; Wim Jg Oyen; Otto C Boerman Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2012-01-27 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Theo J M Ruers; Cornelis J A Punt; Jan Willem Leer; Frans H M Corstens; Wim J G Oyen Journal: Cancer Imaging Date: 2006-10-31 Impact factor: 3.909