Literature DB >> 11345652

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of bi-daily dosing of oral paclitaxel in combination with cyclosporin A.

M M Malingré1, J H Beijnen, H Rosing, F J Koopman, O van Tellingen, K Duchin, W W Ten Bokkel Huinink, M Swart, J Lieverst, J H Schellens.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate dose escalation of bi-daily (b.i.d.) oral paclitaxel in combination with cyclosporin A in order to improve and prolong the systemic exposure to paclitaxel and to explore the maximum tolerated dose and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 15 patients received during course 1 two doses of oral paclitaxel (2 x 60, 2 x 90, 2 x 120, or 2 x 160 mg/m2) 7 h apart in combination with 15 mg/kg of cyclosporin A, co-administered to enhance the absorption of paclitaxel. During subsequent courses, patients received 3-weekly intravenous paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg/m2 as a 3-h infusion.
RESULTS: Toxicities observed following b.i.d. dosing of oral paclitaxel were generally mild and included toxicities common to paclitaxel administration and mild gastrointestinal toxicities such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, which occurred more often at the higher dose levels. Dose escalation of b.i.d. oral paclitaxel from 2 x 60 to 2 x 160 mg/m2 did not result in a significant increase in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of paclitaxel. The AUC after doses of 2 x 60, 90, 120, and 160 mg/m2 were 3.77 +/- 2.70, 4.57 +/- 2.43, 3.62 +/- 1.58, and 8.58 +/- 7.87 microM.h, respectively. The AUC achieved after intravenous administration of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 was 17.95 +/- 3.94 microM.h.
CONCLUSION: Dose increment of paclitaxel did not result in a significant additional increase in the AUC values of the drug. Dose escalation of the b.i.d. dosing regimen was therefore not continued up to DLT. As b.i.d. dosing appeared to result in higher AUC values compared with single-dose administration (data which we have published previously), we recommend b.i.d. dosing of oral paclitaxel for future studies. Although pharmacokinetic data are difficult to interpret, due to the limited number of patients at each dose level and the large interpatient variability, we recommend the dose level of 2 x 90 mg/m2 for further investigation, as this dose level showed the highest systemic exposure to paclitaxel combined with good safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11345652     DOI: 10.1007/s002800000226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  13 in total

Review 1.  Oral delivery of taxanes.

Authors:  M M Malingré; J H Beijnen; J H Schellens
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Different structures of berberine and five other protoberberine alkaloids that affect P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux capacity.

Authors:  Yi-Ting Zhang; Yu-Qi Yu; Xiao-Xia Yan; Wen-Jie Wang; Xiao-Ting Tian; Le Wang; Wei-Liang Zhu; Li-Kun Gong; Guo-Yu Pan
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Absorption mechanism of DHP107, an oral paclitaxel formulation that forms a hydrated lipidic sponge phase.

Authors:  Yura Jang; Hye Jin Chung; Jung Wan Hong; Cheol-Won Yun; Hesson Chung
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Orally bioavailable tubulin antagonists for paclitaxel-refractory cancer.

Authors:  Chien-Ming Li; Yan Lu; Jianjun Chen; Terrence A Costello; Ramesh Narayanan; Mara N Dalton; Linda M Snyder; Sunjoo Ahn; Wei Li; Duane D Miller; James T Dalton
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Enhanced oral paclitaxel bioavailability after administration of paclitaxel-loaded lipid nanocapsules.

Authors:  Sandra Peltier; Jean-Michel Oger; Frédéric Lagarce; William Couet; Jean-Pierre Benoît
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  A phase I study of DHP107, a mucoadhesive lipid form of oral paclitaxel, in patients with advanced solid tumors: crossover comparisons with intravenous paclitaxel.

Authors:  Yong Sang Hong; Kyu-pyo Kim; Hyeong-Seok Lim; Kyun-Seop Bae; Min-Hee Ryu; Jae-Lyun Lee; Heung Moon Chang; Yoon-Koo Kang; Hyeyoun Kim; Tae Won Kim
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.850

7.  A phase Ib study of Oraxol (oral paclitaxel and encequidar) in patients with advanced malignancies.

Authors:  Wen Wee Ma; Jenny J Li; Nilofer S Azad; Elaine T Lam; Jennifer R Diamond; Grace K Dy; Mateusz Opyrchal; Jay Zhi; Douglas Kramer; Wing-Kai Chan; David Cutler; Rudolf Kwan; Alex A Adjei; Antonio Jimeno
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  Population pharmacokinetics of orally administered paclitaxel formulated in Cremophor EL.

Authors:  Milly E de Jonge; Alwin Dr Huitema; Jan Hm Schellens; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Pharmacological effects of formulation vehicles : implications for cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Albert J ten Tije; Jaap Verweij; Walter J Loos; Alex Sparreboom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Phase II and pharmacological study of oral paclitaxel (Paxoral) plus ciclosporin in anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  H H Helgason; C M F Kruijtzer; A D R Huitema; S G Marcus; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; M E Schot; J H Schornagel; J H Beijnen; J H M Schellens
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.