L I Litvyakova1, J N Baraniuk. 1. International Center of Interdisciplinary Studies of Immunology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This review focuses on the uses of nasal provocation testing (NPT) for scientific investigations of the mechanisms of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. It also describes the use of NPT as a diagnostic tool in clinical practice. The indications, contraindications, advantages, and limitations of different techniques for evaluation of nasal responses are reviewed. The paper familiarizes investigators with particulars of different nasal delivery systems, provocation agents, nasal patency measurements, secretion collection, and nasal lavage techniques. DATA SOURCES: Relevant publications obtained from a literature review. STUDY SELECTION: Relevant publications on the topics of NPT, allergic, and nonallergic rhinitis were critically evaluated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: To date, NPT has been used primarily as a research tool for the investigation of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis with a wide variety of techniques depending on the specific scientific purposes. NPT will continue to provide useful information about the pathogenesis of airway diseases. Standardized nasal provocation testing has the potential to become a more frequently used clinical test in the diagnosis of allergic and occupational rhinitis and for determination of the appropriate and focused therapy.
OBJECTIVE: This review focuses on the uses of nasal provocation testing (NPT) for scientific investigations of the mechanisms of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. It also describes the use of NPT as a diagnostic tool in clinical practice. The indications, contraindications, advantages, and limitations of different techniques for evaluation of nasal responses are reviewed. The paper familiarizes investigators with particulars of different nasal delivery systems, provocation agents, nasal patency measurements, secretion collection, and nasal lavage techniques. DATA SOURCES: Relevant publications obtained from a literature review. STUDY SELECTION: Relevant publications on the topics of NPT, allergic, and nonallergic rhinitis were critically evaluated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: To date, NPT has been used primarily as a research tool for the investigation of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis with a wide variety of techniques depending on the specific scientific purposes. NPT will continue to provide useful information about the pathogenesis of airway diseases. Standardized nasal provocation testing has the potential to become a more frequently used clinical test in the diagnosis of allergic and occupational rhinitis and for determination of the appropriate and focused therapy.
Authors: Daniel K C Lee; Kay Haggart; Graeme P Currie; Sandra D Anderson; Brian J Lipworth Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Daniel K C Lee; Catherine M Jackson; Patricia C Soutar; Thomas C Fardon; Brian J Lipworth Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Anne K Ellis; Mena Soliman; Lisa Steacy; Marie-Ève Boulay; Louis-Philippe Boulet; Paul K Keith; Harissios Vliagoftis; Susan Waserman; Helen Neighbour Journal: Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 3.406