Literature DB >> 11344528

Real-time identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa direct from clinical samples using a rapid extraction method and polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

R I Jaffe1, J D Lane, C W Bates.   

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa has emerged as one of the most problematic Gram-negative nosocomial pathogens. Bacteremia caused by P. aeruginosa is clinically indistinguishable from other Gram-negative infections although the mortality rate is higher. This microorganism is also inherently resistant to common antibiotics. Standard bacterial identification and susceptibility testing is normally a 48-hour process and difficulty sometimes exists in rapidly and accurately identifying antimicrobial resistance. The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is a rapid and simple process for the amplification of target DNA sequences. However, many sample preparation methods are unsuitable for the clinical laboratory because they are not cost effective, take too long to perform, or do not provide a good template for PCR. Our goal was to provide same-day results to facilitate rapid diagnosis. In this report, we have utilized our rapid DNA extraction method to generate bacterial DNA direct from clinical samples for PCR. The lower detection level for P. aeruginosa was estimated to be 10 CFU/ml. In addition, we wanted to compare the results of a new rapid-cycle DNA thermocycler that uses continuous fluorescence monitoring with the results of standard thermocycling. We tested 40 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa and 18 non-P. aeruginosa isolates received in a blinded fashion. Coded data revealed that there was 100% correlation in both the rapid-cycle DNA thermocycling and standard thermocycling when compared to standard clinical laboratory results. In addition, total results turn-around time was less than 1 hour. Specific identification of P. aeruginosa was determined using intragenic primer sets for bacterial 16S rRNA and Pseudomonas outer-membrane lipoprotein gene sequences. The total cost of our extraction method and PCR was $2.22 per sample. The accuracy and rapidness of this DNA-extraction method, with its PCR-based identification system, make it an ideal candidate for use in the clinical laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11344528      PMCID: PMC6807775          DOI: 10.1002/jcla.1016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal        ISSN: 0887-8013            Impact factor:   2.352


  16 in total

1.  The agent of bacillary angiomatosis. An approach to the identification of uncultured pathogens.

Authors:  D A Relman; J S Loutit; T M Schmidt; S Falkow; L S Tompkins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-12-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Continuous fluorescence monitoring of rapid cycle DNA amplification.

Authors:  C T Wittwer; M G Herrmann; A A Moss; R P Rasmussen
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.993

3.  Microbiological factors influencing the outcome of nosocomial bloodstream infections: a 6-year validated, population-based model.

Authors:  D Pittet; N Li; R F Woolson; R P Wenzel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Direct detection and identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in clinical samples such as skin biopsy specimens and expectorations by multiplex PCR based on two outer membrane lipoprotein genes, oprI and oprL.

Authors:  D De Vos; A Lim; J P Pirnay; M Struelens; C Vandenvelde; L Duinslaeger; A Vanderkelen; P Cornelis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Application of different genotyping methods for Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a setting of endemicity in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  H Speijer; P H Savelkoul; M J Bonten; E E Stobberingh; J H Tjhie
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Capillary electrophoresis-single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis for rapid identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other gram-negative nonfermenting bacilli recovered from patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  R Ghozzi; P Morand; A Ferroni; J L Beretti; E Bingen; C Segonds; M O Husson; D Izard; P Berche; J L Gaillard
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Etiologic organisms as independent predictors of death and morbidity associated with bloodstream infections.

Authors:  P J Miller; R P Wenzel
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in sputum from cystic fibrosis patients by the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  I McIntosh; J R Govan; D J Brock
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Clinical evaluation of a direct fluorescent monoclonal antibody test for detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in blood cultures.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; M Barrett; F P Koontz; R P Wenzel; M D Cunningham; N Rollins; R P Darveau
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from clinical and environmental samples by amplification of the exotoxin A gene using PCR.

Authors:  A A Khan; C E Cerniglia
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.005

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Pre-PCR processing: strategies to generate PCR-compatible samples.

Authors:  Peter Rådström; Rickard Knutsson; Petra Wolffs; Maria Lövenklev; Charlotta Löfström
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Quinolone-resistant clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from University Hospital in Tunisia.

Authors:  Mouna Ben Nejma; Olfa Sioud; Maha Mastouri
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Proteomic identification of OprL as a seromarker for initial diagnosis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection of patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Aparna R Rao; Anita Laxova; Philip M Farrell; Joseph T Barbieri
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Rapid detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from positive blood cultures by quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Vincent Cattoir; Audrey Gilibert; Jeanne-Marie Le Glaunec; Nathalie Launay; Lilia Bait-Mérabet; Patrick Legrand
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.944

5.  Comparison of the sensitivity of culture, PCR and quantitative real-time PCR for the detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in sputum of cystic fibrosis patients.

Authors:  Pieter Deschaght; Thierry De Baere; Leen Van Simaey; Sabine Van Daele; Frans De Baets; Daniel De Vos; Jean-Paul Pirnay; Mario Vaneechoutte
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-29       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Stenotrophomonas maltophilia prosthetic valve endocarditis: a case report.

Authors:  Sophie Bayle; Clarisse Rovery; Pascal Sbragia; Didier Raoult; Philippe Brouqui
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2008-05-23

7.  Combined effect of linolenic acid and tobramycin on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and quorum sensing.

Authors:  Warren Chanda; Thomson Patrick Joseph; Arshad Ahmed Padhiar; Xuefang Guo; Liu Min; Wendong Wang; Sainyugu Lolokote; Anhong Ning; Jing Cao; Min Huang; Mintao Zhong
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.447

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.