Literature DB >> 11344464

An examination of the psychometric structure of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory.

J A Deisinger1, J E Cassisi, K R Lofland, P Cole, S Bruehl.   

Abstract

Factor analyses to create the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) warrant further examination due to small sample size, the use of separate factor analyses for each MPI section, and lack of evidence for the replicability of the factor model. The present study randomly assigned 972 respondents to one of three samples. Study 1 used data from Sample 1 (n = 452) to examine the replicability of the MPI factor structure reported by Kerns, Turk, and Rudy (1985), and to measure the internal consistencies of MPI scales. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analyses using Sample 2 data (n = 267) verified a revised MPI factor structure that was generated in Study 1; cross-validation was achieved using data from Sample 3 (n = 253). The revised MPI model differed from the original model in its number of scales and pattern of scale loadings. Recommendations for the refinement of the MPI are proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11344464     DOI: 10.1002/jclp.1048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9762


  3 in total

1.  Improving the usefulness of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory.

Authors:  Jeffrey M McKillop; Warren R Nielson
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.037

2.  French translation of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory: L'inventaire multidimensionnel de la douleur.

Authors:  Simon Laliberté; Julie Lamoureux; Michael J L Sullivan; Jean-Marc Miller; Julie Charron; Donald Bouthillier
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.037

3.  Chronic pain assessment: a seven-factor model.

Authors:  Megan A Davidson; Dean A Tripp; Leandre R Fabrigar; Paul R Davidson
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.037

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.