Literature DB >> 11343718

Effects of set-size and selective spatial attention on motion processing.

K R Dobkins1, R G Bosworth.   

Abstract

In order to investigate the effects of divided attention and selective spatial attention on motion processing, we obtained direction-of-motion thresholds using a stochastic motion display under various attentional manipulations and stimulus durations (100-600 ms). To investigate divided attention, we compared motion thresholds obtained when a single motion stimulus was presented in the visual field (set-size=1) to those obtained when the motion stimulus was presented amongst three confusable noise distractors (set-size=4). The magnitude of the observed detriment in performance with an increase in set-size from 1 to 4 could be accounted for by a simple decision model based on signal detection theory, which assumes that attentional resources are not limited in capacity. To investigate selective attention, we compared motion thresholds obtained when a valid pre-cue alerted the subject to the location of the to-be-presented motion stimulus to those obtained when no pre-cue was provided. As expected, the effect of pre-cueing was large when the visual field contained noise distractors, an effect we attribute to "noise reduction" (i.e. the pre-cue allows subjects to exclude irrelevant distractors that would otherwise impair performance). In the single motion stimulus display, we found a significant benefit of pre-cueing only at short durations (< or =150 ms), a result that can potentially be explained by a "time-to-orient" hypothesis (i.e. the pre-cue improves performance by eliminating the time it takes to orient attention to a peripheral stimulus at its onset, thereby increasing the time spent processing the stimulus). Thus, our results suggest that the visual motion system can analyze several stimuli simultaneously without limitations on sensory processing per se, and that spatial pre-cueing serves to reduce the effects of distractors and perhaps increase the effective processing time of the stimulus.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11343718     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00038-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  Attention alters the appearance of motion coherence.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu; Stuart Fuller; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

2.  Effects of spatial cues on color-change detection in humans.

Authors:  James P Herman; Amarender R Bogadhi; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Extending the simultaneous-sequential paradigm to measure perceptual capacity for features and words.

Authors:  Alec Scharff; John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Effects of spatial attention on motion discrimination are greater in the left than right visual field.

Authors:  Rain G Bosworth; Jennifer A F Petrich; Karen R Dobkins
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Evaluating comparative and equality judgments in contrast perception: attention alters appearance.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Jared Abrams; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Fast development of global motion processing in human infants.

Authors:  Emily J Blumenthal; Rain G Bosworth; Karen R Dobkins
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Audiospatial and visuospatial working memory in 6-13 year old school children.

Authors:  Virve Vuontela; Maija-Riikka Steenari; Synnöve Carlson; Juha Koivisto; Mika Fjällberg; Eeva T Aronen
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.