Literature DB >> 11343480

Long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

S J Spechler1, E Lee, D Ahnen, R K Goyal, I Hirano, F Ramirez, J P Raufman, R Sampliner, T Schnell, S Sontag, Z R Vlahcevic, R Young, W Williford.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Severe gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a lifelong problem that can be complicated by peptic esophageal stricture and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for GERD. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Follow-up study conducted from October 1997 through October 1999 of a prospective randomized trial of medical and surgical antireflux treatments in patients with complicated GERD. Mean (median) duration of follow-up was 10.6 years (7.3 years) for medical patients and 9.1 years (6.3 years) for surgical patients. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred thirty-nine (97%) of the original 247 study patients were found (79 were confirmed dead). Among the 160 survivors (157 men and 3 women; mean [SD] age, 67 [12] years), 129 (91 in the medical treatment group and 38 in the surgical treatment group) participated in the follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Use of antireflux medication, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Activity Index (GRACI) scores, grade of esophagitis, frequency of treatment of esophageal stricture, frequency of subsequent antireflux operations, 36-item Short Form health survey (SF-36) scores, satisfaction with antireflux therapy, survival, and incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma, compared between the medical antireflux therapy group and the fundoplication surgery group. Information on cause of death was obtained from autopsy results, hospital records, and death certificates.
RESULTS: Eighty-three (92%) of 90 medical patients and 23 (62%) of 37 surgical patients reported that they used antireflux medications regularly (P<.001). During a 1-week period after discontinuation of medication, mean (SD) GRACI symptom scores were significantly lower in the surgical treatment group (82.6 [17.5] vs 96.7 [21.4] in the medical treatment group; P =.003). However, no significant differences between the groups were found in grade of esophagitis, frequency of treatment of esophageal stricture and subsequent antireflux operations, SF-36 standardized physical and mental component scale scores, and overall satisfaction with antireflux therapy. Survival during a period of 140 months was decreased significantly in the surgical vs the medical treatment group (relative risk of death in the medical group, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.46; P =.047), largely because of excess deaths from heart disease. Patients with Barrett esophagus at baseline developed esophageal adenocarcinomas at an annual rate of 0.4%, whereas these cancers developed in patients without Barrett esophagus at an annual rate of only 0.07%. There was no significant difference between groups in incidence of esophageal cancer.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that antireflux surgery should not be advised with the expectation that patients with GERD will no longer need to take antisecretory medications or that the procedure will prevent esophageal cancer among those with GERD and Barrett esophagus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11343480     DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.18.2331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  206 in total

1.  Endoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease--fact or fancy?

Authors:  Jean Paul Galmiche; Jérôme Barouk
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-06

2.  [Laparoscopic fundoplication. Indications and results].

Authors:  K H Fuchs; H Feussner
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 0.743

3.  Long-term results of a randomized prospective study comparing medical and surgical treatment of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Pascual Parrilla; Luisa F Martínez de Haro; Angeles Ortiz; Vicente Munitiz; Joaquín Molina; Juan Bermejo; Manuel Canteras
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Barrett's esophagus: now what?

Authors:  Jeffrey H Peters
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Argon plasma coagulation therapy for ablation of Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  J Deviere
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia: focus on current treatment options.

Authors:  Leonidas Lekakos; Nikolaos P Karidis; Dimitrios Dimitroulis; Christos Tsigris; Gregory Kouraklis; Nikolaos Nikiteas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  A randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication versus proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): 3-year outcomes.

Authors:  Mehran Anvari; Christopher Allen; John Marshall; David Armstrong; Ron Goeree; Wendy Ungar; Charles Goldsmith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Effectiveness of laparoscopic fundoplication in relieving the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and eliminating antireflux medical therapy.

Authors:  P K Papasavas; R J Keenan; W W Yeaney; P F Caushaj; D J Gagné; R J Landreneau
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Peters; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  A one-year follow-up study of endoluminal gastroplication (Endocinch) in GERD patients refractory to proton pump inhibitor therapy.

Authors:  J Arts; T Lerut; P Rutgeerts; D Sifrim; J Janssens; J Tack
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.