Literature DB >> 11343019

The use of palatal rugae for the assessment of anteroposterior tooth movements.

B R Hoggan1, C Sadowsky.   

Abstract

Currently, cephalometric superimpositions are the accepted means for the assessment of orthodontic tooth movement. The present investigation evaluated the use of palatal rugae as reference points for the measurement of tooth movement, in a manner comparable with cephalometric superimpositions. The sample consisted of pretreatment and posttreatment maxillary study models and lateral cephalometric radiographs from 33 patients who had received orthodontic treatment that involved the extraction of the maxillary first permanent premolars. The mean age at the start of treatment was 13 years 11 months, and the average time between records was 35 months. The anteroposterior movement of the maxillary first molars and central incisors was evaluated with the use of 2 cephalometric variables and 12 study model variables that were reduced to 6 by the combining of the left and right sides. No statistical differences were found between the mean molar movement that was measured cephalometrically and the mean molar movement that was relative to the medial and lateral ends of the first and second palatal rugae or relative to the medial end of the third palatal ruga. Also, no statistical differences were found between the mean incisor movement that was measured cephalometrically and the mean incisor movement that was relative to the medial and lateral end of the third palatal ruga. These findings suggest that ruga landmarks can be used as reliably as cephalometric superimpositions to assess anteroposterior molar movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11343019     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.113001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  50 in total

1.  Dento-Alveolar Distraction Osteogenesis for rapid Orthodontic Canine Retraction.

Authors:  Naveen Kumar; Gs Prashantha; Sudhir Raikar; Krishnappa Ranganath; Silju Mathew; Sandeep Nambiar
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-12-26

2.  Establishing the reliability of palatal rugae pattern in individual identification (following orthodontic treatment).

Authors:  D Shukla; A Chowdhry; D Bablani; P Jain; R Thapar
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  2011-07-01

3.  Does anchorage loss differ with 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot bracket systems?

Authors:  Yassir A Yassir; Grant T McIntyre; Ahmed M El-Angbawi; David R Bearn
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Impact of manual control point selection accuracy on automated surface matching of digital dental models.

Authors:  Kathrin Becker; Benedict Wilmes; Chantal Grandjean; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Skeletally anchored mesialization of molars using digitized casts and two surface-matching approaches : Analysis of treatment effects.

Authors:  Kathrin Becker; Benedict Wilmes; Chantal Grandjean; Sivabalan Vasudavan; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Association among geometric configurations of palatal rugae.

Authors:  M Saadeh; J G Ghafari; R V Haddad; F Ayoub
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  2017-07-01

7.  Superimposition of maxillary digital models using the palatal rugae: Does ageing affect the reliability?

Authors:  Daniela Garib; Felicia Miranda; Marilia S Yatabe; José Roberto Pereira Lauris; Camila Massaro; James A McNamara; Hera Kim-Berman; Guilherme Janson; Rolf G Behrents; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Antonio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Evaluation of canine retraction following periodontal distraction using NiTi coil spring and implants - A clinical study.

Authors:  Rohit Khanna; Tripti Tikku; Kiran Sachan; R P Maurya; Geeta Verma; Vivek Ojha
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2014-11-29

9.  Comparison of anchorage loss following initial leveling and aligning using ROTH and MBT Prescription - A clinical prospective study.

Authors:  M Rajesh; Msv Kishore; K Sadashiva Shetty
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-04-26

10.  A Comparative Study of Canine Retraction by Distraction of the Periodontal Ligament and Dentoalveolar Distraction Methods.

Authors:  Shashidhara Kamath Kateel; Amit Agarwal; Gagan Kharae; Vijay Prakash Nautiyal; Anant Jyoti; P Narayana Prasad
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.