Literature DB >> 11343018

Cephalometric digitization: A determination of the minimum scanner settings necessary for precise landmark identification.

C L Held1, D J Ferguson, M W Gallo.   

Abstract

This study focused on the interpretation of scanned cephalometric images after the digitization of the original analog film, with a variety of standard scanner settings. The purpose was to determine the minimum allowable resolution, grayscale, and color settings of these digital images, without compromising the precision of orthodontic landmark identification. Forty-nine orthodontic residents and faculty at Saint Louis University identified 13 landmarks in 3 separate trials on either an original lateral cephalogram or 1 of 6 digitized radiographic images. They also subjectively assessed the quality of the image. Ability to identify landmarks did not differ significantly among the groups tested. Conversely, opinions of image quality differed significantly among the groups. Participants found the quality of the grayscale images without color to be poorer than that of the original film but could detect differences only at resolution extremes. Prediction of ability to identify landmarks was substantially greater for higher resolution images. In conclusion, the scanner settings used in the digitization of a cephalometric film did not matter significantly when standard settings were used. In addition, subjective opinion of image quality was predictive of how precisely landmarks were identified when the resolution was relatively high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11343018     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.112876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  3 in total

1.  Morphological integration between the cranial base and the face in children and adults.

Authors:  Nikolaos Gkantidis; Demetrios J Halazonetis
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Comparison of manual, digital and lateral CBCT cephalometric analyses.

Authors:  Ricardo de Lima Navarro; Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari-Navarro; Thais Maria Freire Fernandes; Giovani Fidelis de Oliveira; Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti; Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida; Renato Rodrigues de Almeida
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  A hard tissue cephalometric comparative study between hand tracing and computerized tracing.

Authors:  Ramachandra Prabhakar; P Rajakumar; M K Karthikeyan; R Saravanan; N Raj Vikram; Adarsh Reddy
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2014-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.