Literature DB >> 11343017

Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics.

M N Spyropoulos1, D J Halazonetis.   

Abstract

The soft tissue profile has been studied extensively in orthodontics, primarily from lateral cephalometric radiographs, under the assumption that the form of the soft tissue outline largely determines the esthetics of the whole face. The purpose of this study was to assess the relative contribution of the shape of the soft tissue profile outline on the attractiveness of the face, as seen from the profile view. Pretreatment color profile facial photographs of 20 female patients were used. The photographs were scanned, and the soft tissue outlines were digitized. The average outline of the 20 original photographs was then calculated and used as a template for modifying the photographs with computer warping methods. This resulted in 20 warped photographs, all with the same soft tissue outline. Three additional photographs were constructed with 1 face-the composite average of the 20 original photographs-and 3 hairstyles from 3 of the original pictures. The photographs were printed and presented to 10 laypersons and 10 orthodontists for scoring. Scoring was performed on 2 occasions separated by at least 1 week. On the first occasion, the original photographs of 10 of the patients and the warped photographs of the other 10 patients were shown. At the next session, the remaining 10 original and 10 warped photographs were shown. The 3 composite photographs were interspersed with the 20 pictures shown to the judges in each scoring session. Judges were asked to score facial attractiveness on a scale of 0 to 10. The judges were unaware of both the computer modification of the photographs and the purpose of the study. Good agreement was noted between the judges, although the orthodontists tended to be more influenced by the profile outline than did the laypersons. The 3 averaged composite photographs were consistently given the highest scores. The modified photographs were given higher scores than their original counterparts, showing that facial attractiveness is influenced by soft tissue outline form. However, the score improvement was not sufficient to reach the level of the composite images, especially for faces initially judged as being unattractive. This shows that factors other than profile outline shape may be more influential in facial esthetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11343017     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.113656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  18 in total

1.  Curative effect evaluation by using Andrews' six elements for completed orthodontic treatment cases.

Authors:  Chao-Feng Liu; Yan-Hua Xu; Yan Liu
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2021-02-01

2.  Effect of orthognathic surgery on profile esthetics in Class II:1 malocclusions.

Authors:  Katharina Klaus; Christian Heumann; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Esthetic perception of facial profile changes in Class II patients treated with Herbst or Forsus appliances.

Authors:  Alexa Helena Kohler Moresca; Nathaly Dias de Moraes; Francielle Topolski; Carlos Flores-Mir; Alexandre Moro; Ricardo Cesar Moresca; Gisele Maria Correr
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Effects of laterality on esthetic preferences of orthodontists, maxillofacial surgeons, and laypeople regarding the lip position and facial convexity: a psychometric clinical trial.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Mousavi; Parinaz Saeidi Ghorani; Arash Deilamani; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-08-24

5.  Orthopedic correction of growing hyperdivergent, retrognathic patients with miniscrew implants.

Authors:  Peter H Buschang; Roberto Carrillo; P Emile Rossouw
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Influence of premolar extractions on long-term adult facial aesthetics and apparent age.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; Cintia Helena Zingaretti Junqueira; Lucas Marzullo Mendes; Daniela Gamba Garib
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Facial-profile attractiveness changes in adult patients treated with the Herbst appliance.

Authors:  J von Bremen; C Erbe; H Pancherz; S Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Influence of lower facial height changes on frontal facial attractiveness and perception of treatment need by lay people.

Authors:  Selin Kale Varlik; Evren Demirbaş; Metin Orhan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Facial profile esthetic preferences: perception in two Brazilian states.

Authors:  Marina Detoni Vieira de Oliveira; Bruno Lopes da Silveira; Cláudia Trindade Mattos; Mariana Marquezan
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 May-Jun

10.  The Facial Aesthetic index: An additional tool for assessing treatment need.

Authors:  Shobha Sundareswaran; Ranjith Ramakrishnan
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.