Literature DB >> 11342095

Low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis: preoperative versus postoperative initiation in patients undergoing elective hip surgery.

R D Hull1, G F Pineo, S MacIsaac.   

Abstract

Administration of low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis in elective hip implant patients commonly begins 12 h preoperatively in European practices to optimize effectiveness, and 12 to 24 h postoperatively in North American practices to optimize safety. A meta-analysis comparing these two treatment regimes revealed that preoperative initiation demonstrated greater efficacy and superior safety for patients (10.0% rate of total deep-vein thrombosis vs. 15.3%, P = .023). In addition to the pre/postsurgical debate, proximity of initiation of low-molecular-weight heparin in relation to surgery is an issue of critical importance. Recent studies revealed that beginning therapy immediately within 2 h preoperatively or 6 h postoperatively dramatically decreased the risk of venous thrombosis. An investigation of low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis initiated 2 h before elective hip surgery or approximately 6 h after surgery compared with warfarin sodium revealed that total and proximal deep-vein thrombosis rates were reduced in patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin compared with warfarin. The frequencies of deep-vein thrombosis for patients receiving preoperative and postoperative dalteparin vs. warfarin for all deep-vein thrombosis were 36 of 337 (10.7%, P < .001) and 44 of 336 (13.1%, P < .001) vs. 81 of 338 (24.0%); and for proximal deep-vein thrombosis were 3 of 354 (0.8%, P = .035) and 3 of 358 (0.8%, P = .033) vs. 11 of 363 (3.0%). Relative risk reductions for the dalteparin groups vs. warfarin ranged from 45% to 72%. In this case, low-molecular-weight heparin administered in close proximity to surgery provided superior efficacy over warfarin. Major bleeding was significantly increased with the preoperative regimen but not the postoperative regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11342095     DOI: 10.1016/s0049-3848(00)00387-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  7 in total

1.  [Recommendations for the administration of conventional and new antithrombotic agents from the perspective of anesthesiology].

Authors:  W Gogarten; K Hoffmann; H Van Aken
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Thromboembolic disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing joint arthroplasty: Update on prophylaxes.

Authors:  Antonella Mameli; Francesco Marongiu
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-11-18

3.  Comparative effectiveness of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis options for the patient undergoing total hip and knee replacement: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Kapoor; A Ellis; N Shaffer; J Gurwitz; A Chandramohan; J Saulino; A Ishak; T Okubanjo; F Michota; E Hylek; T A Trikalinos
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 5.824

4.  The influence of NSAIDs on coumarin sensitivity in patients with CYP2C9 polymorphism after total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  Maarten J Beinema; Petra H de Jong; Har J M Salden; Merel van Wijnen; Jan van der Meer; Jacobus R B J Brouwers
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 5.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism in spinal surgery.

Authors:  S Brambilla; C Ruosi; G A La Maida; S Caserta
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Preoperative versus postoperative initiation of thromboprophylaxis following major orthopedic surgery: safety and efficacy of postoperative administration supported by recent trials of new oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Carsten Perka
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2011-11-16

7.  Incidence of venous thromboembolism and hemorrhage related safety studies of preoperative anticoagulation therapy in hip fracture patients undergoing surgical treatment: a case-control study.

Authors:  Zhongdi Liu; Na Han; Hailin Xu; Zhongguo Fu; Dianying Zhang; Tianbing Wang; Baoguo Jiang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.