Literature DB >> 11341676

Bias in the introduction of variation as an orienting factor in evolution.

L Y Yampolsky1, A Stoltzfus.   

Abstract

According to New Synthesis doctrine, the direction of evolution is determined by selection and not by "internal causes" that act by way of propensities of variation. This doctrine rests on the theoretical claim that because mutation rates are small in comparison to selection coefficients, mutation is powerless to overcome opposing selection. Using a simple population-genetic model, this claim is shown to depend on assuming the prior availability of variation, so that mutation may act only as a "pressure" on the frequencies of existing alleles, and not as the evolutionary process that introduces novelty. As shown here, mutational bias in the introduction of novelty can strongly influence the course of evolution, even when mutation rates are small in comparison to selection coefficients. Recognizing this mode of causation provides a distinct mechanistic basis for an "internalist" approach to determining the contribution of mutational and developmental factors to evolutionary phenomena such as homoplasy, parallelism, and directionality.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11341676     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2001.003002073.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Dev        ISSN: 1520-541X            Impact factor:   1.930


  44 in total

1.  The anomalous effects of biased mutation.

Authors:  D Waxman; J R Peck
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A bias caused by ectopic development produces sexually dimorphic sperm in nematodes.

Authors:  Christopher Baldi; Jeffrey Viviano; Ronald E Ellis
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Mutation-biased adaptation in Andean house wrens.

Authors:  Arlin Stoltzfus; David M McCandlish
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The structure of the genotype-phenotype map strongly constrains the evolution of non-coding RNA.

Authors:  Kamaludin Dingle; Steffen Schaper; Ard A Louis
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A generative bias towards average complexity in artificial cell lineages.

Authors:  Rolf Lohaus; Nicholas L Geard; Janet Wiles; Ricardo B R Azevedo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Origin of the fittest: link between emergent variation and evolutionary change as a critical question in evolutionary biology.

Authors:  Alexander V Badyaev
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The role of mutation bias in adaptive molecular evolution: insights from convergent changes in protein function.

Authors:  Jay F Storz; Chandrasekhar Natarajan; Anthony V Signore; Christopher C Witt; David M McCandlish; Arlin Stoltzfus
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Directional Selection Rather Than Functional Constraints Can Shape the G Matrix in Rapidly Adapting Asexuals.

Authors:  Kevin Gomez; Jason Bertram; Joanna Masel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Bias and evolution of the mutationally accessible phenotypic space in a developmental system.

Authors:  Christian Braendle; Charles F Baer; Marie-Anne Félix
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.