Literature DB >> 11341545

Asbestos tissue burden study on human malignant mesothelioma.

Y Suzuki1, S R Yuen.   

Abstract

Asbestos fibers in the lung and mesothelial tissues (mesotheliomatous tissue and hyaline plaque) taken from 151 human malignant mesothelioma cases were identified and characterized by high resolution analytical electron microscopy. Asbestos fibers were present in almost all of the lung tissue as well as in the mesothelial tissue. The most common asbestos types seen in the lung were an admixture of chrysotile with amphiboles followed by amphiboles alone and chrysotile alone. The majority of asbestos types seen in the mesothelial tissues were chrysotile alone, followed by chrysotile plus amphibole and amphibole alone. A disproportion of asbestos types between the lung and mesothelial tissues was frequently observed. The most common pattern of the disproportion was chrysotile plus amphibole(s) in the lung and chrysotile only in the mesothelial tissues, followed by amphibole(s) in the lung and chrysotile only in the mesothelial tissues. Such a disproportion was considered to have been caused by chrysotile fiber's strong capacity to translocate from the lung to mesothelial tissues. The number of asbestos fibers in the lung was 456.4 x 10(6) fibers/dry gram in maximum, 0.08 x 106 fibers/dry gram in minimum and 105 x 10(6) fibers/dry gram on average; in the mesothelial tissues it was 240.0 x 106 fibers/dry gram in maximum, 0.03 x 106 fibers/dry gram in minimum and 49.84 x 106 fibers/dry gram on average. These numbers were greater than those seen in the general population. The majority of asbestos fibers detected in the lung and mesothelial tissues were shorter than 5 microm in length. Asbestos fibers fit to Stanton's hypothetical dimensions (> or =8.0 microm in length and < or =0.25 microm in diameter) were only 4.0%, since the majority of these fibers were shorter (<8 microm) and thinner (<0.25 microm) fibers. We concluded that such short, thin asbestos fibers should not be excluded from those contributing to the induction of human malignant mesothelioma. The present study supports that chrysotile asbestos can induce human malignant mesothelioma, since, in some of the mesothelioma cases, asbestos fibers detected in both the lung and mesothelial tissues, or lung tissue alone or mesothelial tissues alone were exclusively chrysotile fibers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11341545     DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.39.150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ind Health        ISSN: 0019-8366            Impact factor:   2.179


  5 in total

Review 1.  Biopersistence and potential adverse health impacts of fibrous nanomaterials: what have we learned from asbestos?

Authors:  Vanesa C Sanchez; Jodie R Pietruska; Nathan R Miselis; Robert H Hurt; Agnes B Kane
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct

Review 2.  Non-neoplastic and neoplastic pleural endpoints following fiber exposure.

Authors:  V Courtney Broaddus; Jeffrey I Everitt; Brad Black; Agnes B Kane
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.393

3.  Comment on 'estimating the asbestos-related lung cancer burden from mesothelioma mortality' - IARC and chrysotile risks.

Authors:  R A Lemen; A L Frank; C L Soskolne; S H Weiss; B Castleman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 4.  Quantitative Assessment of Asbestos Fibers in Normal and Pathological Pleural Tissue-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Yohama Caraballo-Arias; Paola Caffaro; Paolo Boffetta; Francesco Saverio Violante
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-16

5.  Ongoing downplaying of the carcinogenicity of chrysotile asbestos by vested interests.

Authors:  Xaver Baur; Arthur L Frank
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.646

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.