Literature DB >> 11341348

Nonattendance in mammographic screening: a study of intraurban differences in Malmö, Sweden, 1990-1994.

S Matson1, I Andersson, G Berglund, L Janzon, J Manjer.   

Abstract

Mammographic screening may reduce breast cancer mortality. Not all women, however, come for examination. The objective in this study from Malmö has been to assess extent to which the rate of nonattendance varies between residential areas with different sociodemographic profiles. The study is based on 32,605 women, 45 to 68 years old and living in 17 areas, who between 1990 and 1994 were invited to screening. Between age groups, the age-specific nonattendance rate ranged from 31% to 35 % (P < .01). The nonattendance rate was highest for women 65 years or older. Between residential areas, age-adjusted nonattendance rates ranged from 23% to 43% (P < .01). A socioeconomic score was developed to express the socioeconomic circumstances in the residential areas and ranged from -7.18 in the most deprived area to 5.01 in the least. Nonattendance covaried in an inverse fashion with the socioeconomic score (r = -0.78; P < .01). One of three women in this urban population did not accept the invitation to mammographic screening. Our conclusion is that women in areas with less favorable circumstances seem to be less willing to participate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11341348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev        ISSN: 0361-090X


  6 in total

1.  Rate of over-diagnosis of breast cancer 15 years after end of Malmö mammographic screening trial: follow-up study.

Authors:  Sophia Zackrisson; Ingvar Andersson; Lars Janzon; Jonas Manjer; Jens Peter Garne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-03

2.  Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Non-attendance in mammography screening and women's social network: a cohort study on the influence of family composition, social support, attitudes and cancer in close relations.

Authors:  Åsa Ritenius Manjer; Ulla Melin Emilsson; Sophia Zackrisson
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-06-28       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  Female white-collar workers remain at higher risk of breast cancer after adjustments for individual risk factors related to reproduction and lifestyle.

Authors:  Cecilia Kullberg; Jenny Selander; Maria Albin; Signe Borgquist; Jonas Manjer; Per Gustavsson
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca Mottram; Wendy Lynn Knerr; Daniel Gallacher; Hannah Fraser; Lena Al-Khudairy; Abimbola Ayorinde; Sian Williamson; Chidozie Nduka; Olalekan A Uthman; Samantha Johnson; Alexander Tsertsvadze; Christopher Stinton; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Aileen Clarke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Breastfeeding in relation to risk of different breast cancer characteristics.

Authors:  Salma Butt; Signe Borgquist; Lola Anagnostaki; Göran Landberg; Jonas Manjer
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-04-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.