Literature DB >> 11340982

Exposure to 4,4'-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) during moulding of rigid polyurethane foam: determination of airborne MDI and urinary 4,4'-methylenedianiline (MDA).

K Kääriä1, A Hirvonen, H Norppa, P Piirilä, H Vainio, C Rosenberg.   

Abstract

Occupational exposure to 4,4'-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) was measured during moulding of rigid polyurethane foam. The aim of the study was to find out whether an MDI-derived urinary amine metabolite could be detected in the urine of workers exposed to apparently low levels of MDI. Airborne MDI was sampled on 1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-piperazine (2MP)-impregnated glass fibre filters and determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using ultraviolet (UV) and electrochemical (EC) detection. The limit of detection of MDI was 3 ng ml-1 for a 20 microliters injection. The precision of sample preparation, expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD), was 1.3% with UV detection and 2.1% with EC detection at a concentration of 70 ng MDI ml-1 (n = 6). The 2MP-MDI derivative was stable at +4 degrees C up to eight weeks. The accuracy of the method was validated in an international quality control programme. Workers (n = 57) from three different factories participated in the study. Urinary 4,4'-methylenedianiline (MDA) metabolite was determined after acid hydrolysis as heptafluorobutyric anhydride derivatives by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry using chemical ionisation and monitoring negative ions. The limit of detection in urine was 0.2 nmol l-1. The precision of six analyses for a urine sample spiked to a concentration of 1 nmol l-1 was 29% (RSD). The MDI concentrations were below the limit of detection in most (64%) of the air samples collected in the worker's breathing zone. Still, detectable amounts of MDA were found in 97% of the urine samples. Monitoring of urinary MDA appears to be an appropriate method of assessing MDI exposure in work environments with low or undetectable MDI concentrations in the workplace air.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11340982     DOI: 10.1039/b009549o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Analyst        ISSN: 0003-2654            Impact factor:   4.616


  11 in total

1.  Urine 1,6-hexamethylene diamine (HDA) levels among workers exposed to 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI).

Authors:  Linda G T Gaines; Kenneth W Fent; Sheila L Flack; Jennifer M Thomasen; Louise M Ball; David B Richardson; Kai Ding; Stephen G Whittaker; Leena A Nylander-French
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2010-06-07

2.  Dermal, inhalation, and internal exposure to 1,6-HDI and its oligomers in car body repair shop workers and industrial spray painters.

Authors:  A Pronk; F Yu; J Vlaanderen; E Tielemans; L Preller; I Bobeldijk; J A Deddens; U Latza; X Baur; D Heederik
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Biological monitoring of workers exposed to 4,4'-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) in 19 French polyurethane industries.

Authors:  A Robert; P Ducos; J M Francin; P Marsan
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Biological monitoring of exposure to 1,5-naphthalene diisocyanate and 4,4'-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate.

Authors:  C J Sennbro; C H Lindh; C Mattsson; B A G Jönsson; H Tinnerberg
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Ferrocenoyl piperazide as derivatizing agent for the analysis of isocyanates and related compounds using liquid chromatography/electrochemistry/mass spectrometry (LC/EC/MS).

Authors:  Bettina Seiwert; Hartmut Henneken; Uwe Karst
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Severe asthma and death in a worker using methylene diphenyl diisocyanate MDI asthma death.

Authors:  Adam V Wisnewski; Ryan Cooney; Michael Hodgson; Kristinza Giese; Jian Liu; Carrie A Redlich
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  Biomarkers of exposure in Monday morning urine samples as a long-term measure of exposure to aromatic diisocyanates.

Authors:  Håkan Tinnerberg; Karin Broberg; Christian H Lindh; Bo A G Jönsson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Quantitative plasma biomarker analysis in HDI exposure assessment.

Authors:  Sheila L Flack; Kenneth W Fent; Linda G Trelles Gaines; Jennifer M Thomasen; Steve Whittaker; Louise M Ball; Leena A Nylander-French
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-10-04

9.  Elimination kinetics of diisocyanates after specific inhalative challenges in humans: mass spectrometry analysis, as a basis for biomonitoring strategies.

Authors:  Lygia T Budnik; Dennis Nowak; Rolf Merget; Catherine Lemiere; Xaver Baur
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 2.646

Review 10.  Skin exposure to isocyanates: reasons for concern.

Authors:  Dhimiter Bello; Christina A Herrick; Thomas J Smith; Susan R Woskie; Robert P Streicher; Mark R Cullen; Youcheng Liu; Carrie A Redlich
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.