Literature DB >> 11340708

[Bleeding gastroduodenal ulcer: results of surgical management].

N Cheynel1, F Peschaud, O Hagry, P Rat, P Ognois-Ausset, J P Favre.   

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this retrospective study was to report the mortality and morbidity after surgery for bleeding peptic ulcer while the population is aging and while the medical treatment and endoscopic procedures are improving. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study between 1994 and 1999 included 49 patients, 15 women, 34 men, aged 72 +/- 14 years. Patients were separated into three groups: ten with uncontrollable haemorrhages, 28 with recurrent haemorrhages and 11 with persistent haemorrhages. These patients were classified ASA II (n = 6), ASA III (n = 20), ASA IV (n = 21) and ASA V (n = 2). The surgical procedures for gastric ulcers (n = 5) were resection-oversewing (n = 2) or partial gastric resection (n = 3). The surgical procedures for duodenal ulcers (n = 44) were oversewing (n = 30), partial gastric resection (n = 10) or exploratory duodenotomy (n = 4).
RESULTS: The overall postoperative mortality rate was 20.4% (10/49). The mortality rate was 40% (4/10) in patients with massive haemorrhage, 7% (2/28) in patients with recurrent haemorrhage, and 36% (4/11) in patients with persistent haemorrhage. There was no significant difference in the mortality rate in relation to the surgical procedures. The morbidity rate was 45%, including three bleeding recurrences after suture and three duodenal leakages after partial gastric resection.
CONCLUSION: The morbidity and mortality rate after surgery for bleeding peptic ulcer is still high. Recurrent haemorrhages don't worsen the prognosis. Delayed surgery for persistent haemorrhage is associated with a severe prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11340708     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-3944(01)00505-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Chir        ISSN: 0003-3944


  6 in total

1.  Role of transcatheter arterial embolization for massive bleeding from gastroduodenal ulcers.

Authors:  Romaric Loffroy; Boris Guiu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Short- and long-term results of transcatheter embolization for massive arterial hemorrhage from gastroduodenal ulcers not controlled by endoscopic hemostasis.

Authors:  Romaric Loffroy; Boris Guiu; Lise Mezzetta; Anne Minello; Christophe Michiels; Jean-Louis Jouve; Nicolas Cheynel; Patrick Rat; Jean-Pierre Cercueil; Denis Krausé
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 3.  Bleeding Duodenal Ulcer: Strategies in High-Risk Ulcers.

Authors:  Markus Mille; Thomas Engelhardt; Albrecht Stier
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-12-18

Review 4.  Embolization versus surgery for peptic ulcer bleeding after failed endoscopic hemostasis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Moe Kyaw; Yee Tse; Daphne Ang; Tiing Leong Ang; James Lau
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2014-03-07

5.  Endoscopic View of Gastroduodenal Artery Coils at the Base of Duodenal Ulcer in Case of Recurrent Massive Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed.

Authors:  Rawaa Ebrahem; Salam Kadhem; John W Frey; William Salyers
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-04-13

6.  Perforated and bleeding peptic ulcer: WSES guidelines.

Authors:  Antonio Tarasconi; Federico Coccolini; Walter L Biffl; Matteo Tomasoni; Luca Ansaloni; Edoardo Picetti; Sarah Molfino; Vishal Shelat; Stefania Cimbanassi; Dieter G Weber; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Fabio C Campanile; Salomone Di Saverio; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Claudio Casella; Michael D Kelly; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Ari Leppaniemi; Ernest E Moore; Andrew Peitzman; Gustavo Pereira Fraga; Marco Ceresoli; Ronald V Maier; Imtaz Wani; Vittoria Pattonieri; Gennaro Perrone; George Velmahos; Michael Sugrue; Massimo Sartelli; Yoram Kluger; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 5.469

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.