Literature DB >> 11340209

Chiropractic manipulation and stroke: a population-based case-control study.

D M Rothwell1, S J Bondy, J I Williams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Several reports have linked chiropractic manipulation of the neck to dissection or occlusion of the vertebral artery. However, previous studies linking such strokes to neck manipulation consist primarily of uncontrolled case series. We designed a population-based nested case-control study to test the association.
METHODS: Hospitalization records were used to identify vertebrobasilar accidents (VBAs) in Ontario, Canada, during 1993-1998. Each of 582 cases was age and sex matched to 4 controls from the Ontario population with no history of stroke at the event date. Public health insurance billing records were used to document use of chiropractic services before the event date.
RESULTS: Results for those aged <45 years showed VBA cases to be 5 times more likely than controls to have visited a chiropractor within 1 week of the VBA (95% CI from bootstrapping, 1.32 to 43.87). Additionally, in the younger age group, cases were 5 times as likely to have had >/=3 visits with a cervical diagnosis in the month before the case's VBA date (95% CI from bootstrapping, 1.34 to 18.57). No significant associations were found for those aged >/=45 years.
CONCLUSIONS: While our analysis is consistent with a positive association in young adults, potential sources of bias are also discussed. The rarity of VBAs makes this association difficult to study despite high volumes of chiropractic treatment. Because of the popularity of spinal manipulation, high-quality research on both its risks and benefits is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11340209     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.32.5.1054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  65 in total

1.  Spinal manipulation: its safety is uncertain.

Authors:  Edzard Ernst
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Cervical manipulation and risk of stroke.

Authors:  M K Kapral; S J Bondy
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Update from the Canadian Stroke Consortium.

Authors:  J W Norris; V Beletsky
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Assessing the risks of cervical manipulation for neck pain.

Authors:  Gregory T Wright
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Clarifying chiropractic manipulation risks.

Authors:  William J Lauretti
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-04-02       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Chiropractic care: a flawed risk-benefit analysis?

Authors:  Eric L Hurwitz; William C Meeker; Monica Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Chiropractic spinal manipulation for back pain.

Authors:  E Ernst
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Chiropractic care: attempting a risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  E Ernst
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Manipulative practice in the cervical spine: a survey of IFOMPT member countries.

Authors:  Lisa Carlesso; Darren Rivett
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-05

10.  Vertebral artery dissection in a patient practicing self-manipulation of the neck.

Authors:  John S Mosby; Stephen M Duray
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2011-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.