Literature DB >> 11340140

Influence of stent edge angle on endothelialization in an in vitro model.

M Hamuro1, J C Palmaz, E A Sprague, C Fuss, J Luo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of topographic features in the path of migrating endothelial cells, specifically the effect of edge angle of intravascular metallic material on endothelialization.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Flat 1-cm x 1-cm 316-L pieces of stainless steel were placed on confluent monolayers of human aortic endothelial cells. The thickness of each metal piece was ground to achieve an edge angle of 35 degrees, 70 degrees, 90 degrees, or 140 degrees (n = 6 each) in relation to the endothelial surface. Migration distance and density of endothelial cell coverage on the metal pieces were measured in groups of six each under static conditions at 4, 7, and 11 days and flow conditions (16 dynes/cm(2)) at 4 days.
RESULTS: Endothelial cell migration distance along the surface of the pieces with edge angles of 35 degrees was significantly greater than that with those with larger angles (P < .05) under static and flow conditions. The migration distances on the 35 degrees piece were 87.5%, 47.3%, 57.1%, and 66.1% greater than those on the 90 degrees piece at the upstream, downstream, right, and left edges, respectively. There were no significant differences in cell density among different angle groups under flow or static conditions.
CONCLUSION: The edge angle of intravascular metallic material has an influence on the rate of endothelialization. A smaller edge angle facilitates endothelialization over metallic material when compared to a larger angle. These results demonstrate the importance of metallic stent profile on endothelialization rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11340140     DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61484-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  7 in total

1.  Impact of stent design on intra-aneurysmal flow. A computer simulation study.

Authors:  M Ohta; M Hirabayashi; S Wetzel; P Lylyk; H Wata; S Tsutsumi; D A Rüfenacht
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Stent strut streamlining and thickness reduction promote endothelialization.

Authors:  Duy T Nguyen; Alexander F Smith; Juan M Jiménez
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 4.293

Review 3.  Biomechanical issues in endovascular device design.

Authors:  James E Moore
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.487

4.  Hemodynamically driven stent strut design.

Authors:  Juan M Jiménez; Peter F Davies
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Human aortic endothelial cell response to 316L stainless steel material microstructure.

Authors:  Animesh Choubey; Denes Marton; Eugene A Sprague
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Axial stent strut angle influences wall shear stress after stent implantation: analysis using 3D computational fluid dynamics models of stent foreshortening.

Authors:  John F LaDisa; Lars E Olson; Douglas A Hettrick; David C Warltier; Judy R Kersten; Paul S Pagel
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Integrating particle tracking with computational fluid dynamics to assess haemodynamic perturbation by coronary artery stents.

Authors:  Luke Boldock; Amanda Inzoli; Silvia Bonardelli; Sarah Hsiao; Alberto Marzo; Andrew Narracott; Julian Gunn; Gabriele Dubini; Claudio Chiastra; Ian Halliday; Paul D Morris; Paul C Evans; Perrault C M
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 3.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.