Literature DB >> 11340002

Improving clinical decisions and outcomes with information: a review.

W M Tierney1.   

Abstract

The clinical information available to clinicians is expanding rapidly. It can enhance clinical decision-making, but it can also confuse the process. To be most useful, information should be available at the time and place it is needed and be specific to the task at hand. In the new paradigm of medicine, one based on continuous quality improvement, useful information must be relevant to both the processes and outcomes of care. Clinical practice guidelines have become increasingly popular for improving the quality of health care. The field of medical informatics can bring cogent information to the point where decisions are being made to augment quality improvement activities in general, and practice guidelines in particular. However, such innovations are dependent on the type, quantity, and quality of information available. This article discusses when guidelines can enhance the quality and outcomes of care and how medical informatics can help achieve these goals. In particular, the barriers to the broad implementation of electronic medical records in a variety of health care settings are explored.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11340002     DOI: 10.1016/s1386-5056(01)00127-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  23 in total

1.  Effect of CPOE user interface design on user-initiated access to educational and patient information during clinical care.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; Antoine J Geissbuhler; William D Dupont; Dario A Giuse; Douglas A Talbert; William M Tierney; W Dale Plummer; William W Stead; Randolph A Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Just-in-time knowledge management and patient care.

Authors:  G Octo Barnett; Henry Chueh
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

Review 3.  Technology-enabled knowledge translation: building a framework for collaboration.

Authors:  Kendall Ho; Arun Chockalingam; Allan Best; Geoff Walsh; Allen Chockalingam
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  How usability of a web-based clinical decision support system has the potential to contribute to adverse medical events.

Authors:  Timothy A D Graham; Andre W Kushniruk; Michael J Bullard; Brian R Holroyd; David P Meurer; Brian H Rowe
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

5.  EHR in emergency rooms: exploring the effect of key information components on main complaints.

Authors:  Ofir Ben-Assuli; Itamar Shabtai; Moshe Leshno; Shawndra Hill
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Effect of clinical decision support on documented guideline adherence for head CT in emergency department patients with mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Anurag Gupta; Ivan K Ip; Ali S Raja; James E Andruchow; Aaron Sodickson; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Actionable recommendations in the Bright Futures child health supervision guidelines.

Authors:  S M E Finnell; J L Stanton; S M Downs
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 8.  The design of decisions: Matching clinical decision support recommendations to Nielsen's design heuristics.

Authors:  Kristen Miller; Muge Capan; Danielle Weldon; Yaman Noaiseh; Rebecca Kowalski; Rachel Kraft; Sanford Schwartz; William S Weintraub; Ryan Arnold
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.046

9.  Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care.

Authors:  William M Tierney; J Marc Overhage; Michael D Murray; Lisa E Harris; Xiao-Hua Zhou; George J Eckert; Faye E Smith; Nancy Nienaber; Clement J McDonald; Fredric D Wolinsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Implementation and evaluation of a nurse-centered computerized potassium regulation protocol in the intensive care unit--a before and after analysis.

Authors:  Miriam Hoekstra; Mathijs Vogelzang; José T Drost; Marcel Janse; Bert G Loef; Iwan C C van der Horst; Felix Zijlstra; Maarten W N Nijsten
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.