Literature DB >> 11339779

Spinal anesthesia improves the early recovery profile of patients undergoing ambulatory knee arthroscopy.

J Wong1, S Marshall, F Chung, D Sinclair, D Song, D Tong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the recovery profiles, postoperative complications, perioperative OR utilization times, and times to discharge of patients undergoing ambulatory knee arthroscopy under spinal anesthesia (SA) or general anesthesia (GA).
METHODS: In this randomized, prospective study, 84 ASA I-II patients were randomized to receive either SA with 50 mg of 1% lidocaine, or a standardized GA. Postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, sedation, OR utilization, postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and ambulatory surgical unit (ASU) recovery were compared.
RESULTS: Patients in the GA group had more pain in the PACU than the SA group (61% vs 15%, P <0.01), and a higher incidence of PACU analgesic use (59% vs 7.5%, P <0.01). Patients in the SA group were able to drink and eat sooner than the GA group (83 +/- 23 vs 95 +/- 22 min, P <0.05 and 88 +/- 27 vs 105 +/- 29 min, P <0.01, respectively). The times to sit, walk, and void were similar. The length of PACU and ASU stay between the GA and SA groups were similar (67 +/- 17 vs 60 +/- 19 min, P >0.05 and 122 +/- 27 vs 127.9 +/- 31 min, P >0.05, respectively). The incidence of backache was higher in the SA group (35 vs 13.6%, P <0.05) than the GA group. However, the incidence of sore throat was higher in the GA compared to the SA group (25% vs 2.5%, P <0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: SA with 50 mg of 1% lidocaine provides an improved recovery profile for ambulatory knee arthroscopy. Discharge times were similar, and with the exception of backache and sore throat, the incidence of complications was similar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11339779     DOI: 10.1007/BF03014965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  8 in total

1.  A comparison of intraarticular morphine and bupivacaine for pain control and outpatient status after an arthroscopic knee surgery under a low dose of spinal anaesthesia.

Authors:  Ahmet Eroglu; Sebnem Saracoglu; Engin Erturk; Muge Kosucu; Servet Kerimoglu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Effects of adding magnesium to bupivacaine and fentanyl for spinal anesthesia in knee arthroscopy.

Authors:  Hüban Dayioğlu; Zehra N Baykara; Asena Salbes; Mine Solak; Kamil Toker
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  [Use of 2 % hyperbaric prilocaine for spinal anesthesia : sensitivity analysis in outpatient surgery].

Authors:  D A Vagts; C H Bley; C W Mutz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Regional anesthesia for children undergoing orthopedic ambulatory surgeries in the United States, 1996-2006.

Authors:  Cassie Kuo; Alison Edwards; Madhu Mazumdar; Stavros G Memtsoudis
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-06-20

Review 5.  [Pain therapy for the lower extremities].

Authors:  C J P Simanski
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  The influence of various anesthesia techniques on postoperative recovery and discharge criteria among geriatric patients.

Authors:  Dilsen Ornek; Seyhan Metin; Serpil Deren; Canan Un; Mustafa Metin; Bayazit Dikmen; Nermin Gogus
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  Short Communication: Lumbar Plexus Block versus Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block to Provide Analgesia Following Hip and Femur Surgery in Pediatric-Aged Patients - An Analysis of a Case Series.

Authors:  Lauren DeLong; Senthil Krishna; Catherine Roth; Giorgio Veneziano; Mauricio Arce Villalobos; Kevin Klingele; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2021-10-19

Review 8.  Regional anesthesia and obesity.

Authors:  Jay B Brodsky; Harry J M Lemmens
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.479

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.