Literature DB >> 11339704

Monitoring long-term ecological changes through the Ecological Monitoring and Assessment Network: science-based and policy relevant.

H Vaughan1, T Brydges, A Fenech, A Lumb.   

Abstract

Ecological monitoring and its associated research programs have often provided answers to various environmental management issues. In the face of changing environmental conditions, ecological monitoring provides decision-makers with reliable information as they grapple with maintaining a sustainable economy and healthy environment. The Ecological Monitoring and Assessment Network (EMAN) is a national ecological monitoring network consisting of (1) about 100 case study sites across the country characterized by long-term multi-disciplinary environmental work conducted by a multitude of agencies (142 partners and counting); (2) a variety of less comprehensive yet more extensive monitoring sites; (3) a network where core monitoring variables of ecosystem change are measured; and (4) geo-referenced environmental observations. Environment Canada is the co-ordinating partner for the network through the EMAN Co-ordinating Office. EMAN's mission is to focus a scientifically-sound, policy-relevant ecosystem monitoring and research network based on (a) stabilizing a network of case-study sites operated by a variety of partners, and (b) developing a number of cooperative dispersed monitoring initiatives in order to deliver unique and needed goods and services. These goods and services include: (1) an efficient and cost-effective early warning system which detects, describes and reports on changes in Canadian ecosystems at a national or ecozone scale; and (2) cross-disciplinary and cross-jurisdictional assessments of ecosystem status, trends and processes. The early warning system and assessments of ecosystem status, trends and processes provide Environment Canada and partner organizations with timely information that facilitates increasingly adaptive policies and priority setting. Canadians are also informed of changes and trends occurring in Canadian ecosystems and, as a result, are better able to make decisions related to conservation and sustainability.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11339704     DOI: 10.1023/a:1006423432114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  8 in total

1.  Establishing the Canadian Community Monitoring Network.

Authors:  Graham Whitelaw; Hague Vaughan; Brian Craig; David Atkinson
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2003 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Linking ecological science to decision-making: delivering environmental monitoring information as societal feedback.

Authors:  Hague Vaughan; Graham Whitelaw; Brian Craig; Craig Stewart
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2003 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Criteria to assess and select sites for long-term avian monitoring in an urbanizing landscape.

Authors:  Lorne P Bennett; Robert J Milne
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Monitoring the condition of natural resources in US national parks.

Authors:  S G Fancy; J E Gross; S L Carter
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Measurement instability and temporal bias in chemical soil monitoring: sources and control measures.

Authors:  André Desaules
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Monitoring for a specific management objective: protection of shorebird foraging habitat adjacent to a waste water treatment plant.

Authors:  Liz Morris; David Petch; David May; William K Steele
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Simulating dissolved organic carbon dynamics at the swedish integrated monitoring sites with the integrated catchments model for carbon, INCA-C.

Authors:  M N Futter; S Löfgren; S J Köhler; L Lundin; F Moldan; L Bringmark
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.129

8.  Phylogenetic and functional metagenomic profiling for assessing microbial biodiversity in environmental monitoring.

Authors:  Veljo Kisand; Angelica Valente; Armin Lahm; Gerard Tanet; Teresa Lettieri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.