Literature DB >> 11338317

Air pollution and birth weight in Britain in 1946.

M Bobak1, M Richards, M Wadsworth.   

Abstract

Recent studies suggested that air pollution might be related to low birth weight. We tested this hypothesis on data from the British 1946 birth cohort. We found a strong association between birth weight and an air pollution index based on coal consumption. Babies born in the most polluted areas were on average 87 grams lighter than those born in the areas with the cleanest air. Adjustment for a number of sociodemographic factors did not change these estimates. While confounding by unmeasured factors cannot be ruled out, these historical data support the hypothesis that birth weight could be affected by air pollution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11338317     DOI: 10.1097/00001648-200105000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  13 in total

1.  Impact of ambient air pollution on birth weight in Sydney, Australia.

Authors:  T Mannes; B Jalaludin; G Morgan; D Lincoln; V Sheppeard; S Corbett
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Industrial air pollution and low birth weight: a case-control study in Texas, USA.

Authors:  Xi Gong; Yan Lin; F Benjamin Zhan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Exposure to ambient air pollution and prenatal and early childhood health effects.

Authors:  Marina Lacasaña; Ana Esplugues; Ferran Ballester
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Relation between children's height and outdoor air pollution from coal-burning sources in the British 1946 birth cohort.

Authors:  Martin Bobak; Marcus Richards; Michael Wadsworth
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Air pollution in early life and adult mortality from chronic rheumatic heart disease.

Authors:  David I W Phillips; Clive Osmond; Martin L Williams; Alexander Jones
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 6.  Ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Radim J Srám; Blanka Binková; Jan Dejmek; Martin Bobak
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Birth outcomes and prenatal exposure to ozone, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter: results from the Children's Health Study.

Authors:  Muhammad T Salam; Joshua Millstein; Yu-Fen Li; Frederick W Lurmann; Helene G Margolis; Frank D Gilliland
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Health and environmental consequences of the world trade center disaster.

Authors:  Philip J Landrigan; Paul J Lioy; George Thurston; Gertrud Berkowitz; L C Chen; Steven N Chillrud; Stephen H Gavett; Panos G Georgopoulos; Alison S Geyh; Stephen Levin; Frederica Perera; Stephen M Rappaport; Christopher Small
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Assessing the health benefits of air pollution reduction for children.

Authors:  Eva Y Wong; Julia Gohlke; William C Griffith; Scott Farrow; Elaine M Faustman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Children's health and the environment: public health issues and challenges for risk assessment.

Authors:  Philip J Landrigan; Carole A Kimmel; Adolfo Correa; Brenda Eskenazi
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.