Literature DB >> 11337964

Ultraviolet light and mating behaviour in domestic broiler breeders.

E K Jones1, N B Prescott, P Cook, R P White, C M Wathes.   

Abstract

1. The perception of UVA light (320 < lambda < 400 nm) by domestic fowl may be an adaptation to naturally lit habitats and may still be functional in farmed varieties, although not utilised owing to the absence of these wavelengths in commercial house lighting. One function may be the mediation of sexually related signalling or communication. 2. In experiment 1, two groups of 41 adult broiler breeders (four cockerels, 37 hens) were kept under conventional fluorescent light, with or without fluorescent UVA supplementation amounting to 16.9% of the total spectral power output of the luminaires. Each light environment was approximately iso-illuminant as perceived by the birds. The two groups were exposed to the light environments alternately for five 2-day periods in a cross-over design. Mating behaviour, production measures and time budgets were recorded on the second day of each period. 3. A UVA-enriched environment increased the number of attempted matings (1.27 vs 0.99 matings/cockerel.h) and locomotion (5.3 vs 3.7 min/bird.hour). 4. In a second experiment, 10 hens were allowed to choose between four cockerels lit under different power levels of UVA (1.6%, 14.6%, 43.5%, 57.5% of the total spectral power output of the luminaires) in a four-armed maze. Again, each light environment was approximately iso-illuminant as perceived by the birds. Each hen was allowed to make one choice per day over four days, with the position of the cockerels and the UVA levels interchanged each day. This schedule was repeated with the same hens for two other groups of four cockerels. 5. At a distance of no less than 60 cm from the cockerel, the hens spent most time inspecting whichever cockerel was lit by 1.6% or 14.6% UVA (1.33 vs 1.37 vs 1.22 vs 1.16 log seconds/hen.choice, respectively for increasing UVA level). Similarly, when allowed to approach closer to the cockerels, the hens spent most time in the arm which contained a cockerel lit by 14.6% UVA light, (1.62 vs 1.88 vs 1.69 vs 1.51 log s/hen.choice, respectively for increasing UVA level). 6. UVA is clearly implicated in the transmission of sexual signals or communication which may have implications for the welfare and production of broiler breeders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11337964     DOI: 10.1080/713655008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  5 in total

Review 1.  Environmental Enrichment for Broiler Breeders: An Undeveloped Field.

Authors:  Anja B Riber; Ingrid C de Jong; Heleen A van de Weerd; Sanna Steenfeldt
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-06-09

2.  The effect of supplementary ultraviolet wavelengths on broiler chicken welfare indicators.

Authors:  Charlotte James; Lucy Asher; Katherine Herborn; Julian Wiseman
Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.448

3.  Effects of Ultraviolet Light Supplementation on Pekin Duck Production, Behavior, and Welfare.

Authors:  Gabrielle M House; Eric B Sobotik; Jill R Nelson; Gregory S Archer
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Skin exposure to UVB light induces a skin-brain-gonad axis and sexual behavior.

Authors:  Roma Parikh; Eschar Sorek; Shivang Parikh; Keren Michael; Lior Bikovski; Sagi Tshori; Galit Shefer; Shira Mingelgreen; Taiba Zornitzki; Hilla Knobler; Gabriel Chodick; Mariya Mardamshina; Arjan Boonman; Noga Kronfeld-Schor; Hadas Bar-Joseph; Dalit Ben-Yosef; Hadar Amir; Mor Pavlovsky; Hagit Matz; Tom Ben-Dov; Tamar Golan; Eran Nizri; Daphna Liber; Yair Liel; Ronen Brenner; Yftach Gepner; Orit Karnieli-Miller; Rina Hemi; Ruth Shalgi; Tali Kimchi; Ruth Percik; Aron Weller; Carmit Levy
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  Influence of Different Light Spectrums on Behaviour and Welfare in Laying Hens.

Authors:  Anette Wichman; Rosan De Groot; Olle Håstad; Helena Wall; Diana Rubene
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.