Literature DB >> 11337566

Ki-67 immunostaining in pancreatic cancer and chronic active pancreatitis: does in vivo FDG uptake correlate with proliferative activity?

A C Buck1, H H Schirrmeister, C A Guhlmann, C G Diederichs, C Shen, I Buchmann, J Kotzerke, D Birk, T Mattfeldt, S N Reske.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: PET with 18F-FDG has been shown to be useful in the detection and staging of pancreatic cancer. However, whether FDG uptake is dependent on proliferative activity is still unclear. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate a probable correlation between FDG uptake and proliferative activity in benign and malignant pancreatic tumors.
METHODS: Our series consisted of 23 patients with pancreatic cancer and 9 patients with chronic active pancreatitis (CAP). FDG PET was performed within 2 wk before surgery, and standardized uptake values (SUVs) were calculated for benign and malignant pancreatic tumors. Patients were selected when focally increased FDG uptake in previously known pancreatic tumors was present. Proliferation fraction was measured in tissue specimens using the anti-Ki-67 antibody MIB-1. A computer-assisted imaging system was used for quantification of nuclear Ki-67 immunostaining. Immunohistochemical findings were correlated to SUVS:
RESULTS: Pancreatic cancer showed both intense nuclear staining of Ki-67 (39% +/- 16%) and high FDG uptake (SUV = 3.6 +/- 1.6). However, no significant correlation was found between in vivo FDG uptake and Ki-67 immunoreactivity (P = 0.65). By contrast, Ki-67 nuclear staining was significantly lower (3.8% +/- 2.7%, P < 0.05) in CAP, whereas FDG uptake was in the same range as for pancreatic cancer (SUV = 3.5 +/- 1.8).
CONCLUSION: FDG uptake did not correlate with proliferative activity in pancreatic cancer. Proliferative activity was tenfold higher in malignant pancreatic tumors than in benign tumors associated with CAP, whereas FDG uptake in vivo did not differ significantly. Thus, a PET tracer indicating cellular proliferation should better differentiate between cancer and inflammatory lesions than do metabolic markers such as FDG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11337566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  29 in total

1.  Comparison of 3'-deoxy-3'-[¹⁸F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography (FLT PET) and FDG PET/CT for the detection and characterization of pancreatic tumours.

Authors:  K Herrmann; M Erkan; M Dobritz; T Schuster; J T Siveke; A J Beer; H J Wester; R M Schmid; H Friess; M Schwaiger; J Kleeff; A K Buck
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Oncologic positron emission tomography: a surgical perspective.

Authors:  Todd O Moore; Landis K Griffeth
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-01

Review 3.  Advancement in treatment and diagnosis of pancreatic cancer with radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Yu-Ping Xu; Min Yang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-02-15

4.  Clinical relevance of imaging proliferative activity in lung nodules.

Authors:  Andreas K Buck; Martin Hetzel; Holger Schirrmeister; Gisela Halter; Peter Möller; Clemens Kratochwil; Andreas Wahl; Gerhard Glatting; Felix M Mottaghy; Torsten Mattfeldt; Bernd Neumaier; Sven N Reske
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Utility of PET/CT in diagnosis, staging, assessment of resectability and metabolic response of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Xiao-Yi Wang; Feng Yang; Chen Jin; De-Liang Fu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Molecular imaging for early prediction of response to Sorafenib treatment in sarcoma.

Authors:  Zhoulei Li; Ken Herrmann; Sabine Pirsig; Kathrin Philipp-Abbrederis; Martin Henninger; Michaela Aichler; Annette Feuchtinger; Axel Walch; Ambros J Beer; Ingo Ringshausen; Kelsey L Pomykala; Klemens Scheidhauer; Markus Schwaiger; Ulrich Keller; Andreas K Buck
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-12-15

7.  Potential impact of [18F]3'-deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine versus [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in positron emission tomography for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D L Francis; D Visvikis; D C Costa; T H A Arulampalam; C Townsend; S K Luthra; I Taylor; P J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Fluorinated tracers for imaging cancer with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Olivier Couturier; André Luxen; Jean-François Chatal; Jean-Philippe Vuillez; Pierre Rigo; Roland Hustinx
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Histological and prognostic importance of CD44(+) /CD24(+) /EpCAM(+) expression in clinical pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Yusuke Ohara; Tatsuya Oda; Masato Sugano; Shinji Hashimoto; Tsuyoshi Enomoto; Keiichi Yamada; Yoshimasa Akashi; Ryoichi Miyamoto; Akihiko Kobayashi; Kiyoshi Fukunaga; Yukio Morishita; Nobuhiro Ohkohchi
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 6.716

10.  In vivo imaging of cellular proliferation in colorectal cancer using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  D L Francis; A Freeman; D Visvikis; D C Costa; S K Luthra; M Novelli; I Taylor; P J Ell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.