Literature DB >> 11337211

Recall bias in a prospective cohort study of acute time-varying exposures: example from the herpetic eye disease study.

K E Kip1, F Cohen, S R Cole, K R Wilhelmus, D L Patrick, R C Blair, R W Beck.   

Abstract

Recall bias is possible in a prospective cohort study when exposure status is transient and must be periodically recalled, and ascertainment occurs after symptom onset. We know of no published demonstration of such bias at play in a prospective cohort study. In a substudy of a randomized clinical trial, 308 participants were prospectively followed to investigate potential acute triggers of ocular herpes simplex virus (HSV) recurrences. Participants reported on the presence of systemic infection or high psychological stress (exposures) on a home log that was completed weekly for up to 15 months and mailed to the study's coordinating centers. By protocol, exposure reporting was to occur on the last day of the week (Sunday) so that a prospective 1-week lag period between exposure and outcome in the following week could be assessed. The study outcome was development of a recurrence of ocular HSV disease documented by clinical examination. Using 35 weekly reports of exposure properly completed before the week of an outcome, there was no evidence of higher risk of HSV recurrence associated with systemic infection (rate ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-2.02) or high psychological stress rate (ratio = 0.0, 95% CI: 0.0-undefined). In contrast, when the analysis was based on 26 weekly reports of exposure improperly completed on or after the date of outcome, the risk of recurrence associated with systemic infection was estimated to be 4-fold (rate ratio = 4.07, 95% CI: 1.84-8.98), and there was a suggestion of a 2-fold risk associated with high psychological stress (rate ratio = 2.02, 95% CI: 0.69-5.91). Without real-time monitoring of exposure reporting, preservation of the temporal exposure-disease relationship-an implicit assumption of the prospective cohort study design-may be particularly tenuous when transient exposures are investigated longitudinally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11337211     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00310-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  12 in total

Review 1.  Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis.

Authors:  Kirk R Wilhelmus
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-09

Review 2.  Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis.

Authors:  Kirk R Wilhelmus
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-12-08

3.  Effectiveness of aprepitant in addition to ondansetron in the prevention of nausea and vomiting caused by fractionated radiotherapy to the upper abdomen (AVERT).

Authors:  Steven Ades; M Halyard; K Wilson; T Ashikaga; R Heimann; S Kumar; W Blackstock
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Psychological stress exacerbates primary vaginal herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) infection by impairing both innate and adaptive immune responses.

Authors:  Kathleen A Ashcraft; Robert H Bonneau
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 7.217

5.  Association between unprotected ultraviolet radiation exposure and recurrence of ocular herpes simplex virus.

Authors:  Christina Ludema; Stephen R Cole; Charles Poole; Jennifer S Smith; Victor J Schoenbach; Kirk R Wilhelmus
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Psychological stress impairs the local CD8+ T cell response to mucosal HSV-1 infection and allows for increased pathogenicity via a glucocorticoid receptor-mediated mechanism.

Authors:  Kathleen A Ashcraft; John Hunzeker; Robert H Bonneau
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 4.905

7.  An investigation of methods to improve recall for the patient-reported outcome measurement in COPD patients: a pilot randomised control trial and feasibility study protocol.

Authors:  Sheree M S Smith; Stephen Jan; Joseph Descallar; Guy B Marks
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2019-07-18

8.  Potential sources of bias in the use of individual's recall of the frequency of exposure to air pollution for use in exposure assessment in epidemiological studies: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Paul R Hunter; Karen Bickerstaff; Maria A Davies
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  Feasibility of collecting vulvar pain variability and its correlates using prospective collection with smartphones.

Authors:  Ruby H N Nguyen; Rachael M Turner; Jared Sieling; David A Williams; James S Hodges; Bernard L Harlow
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2014-06-10

Review 10.  Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods.

Authors:  Alaa Althubaiti
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2016-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.