Literature DB >> 11336906

The shortening reaction of forearm muscles: the influence of central set.

G Miscio1, F Pisano, C Del Conte, D Pianca, R Colombo, M Schieppati.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The EMG of the forearm muscles shortened by an imposed wrist joint displacement has been studied at different levels and distribution of background muscle activity and with different instructions to the subjects, in order to test the hypothesis that the recorded EMG response (shortening reaction, ShoRe) could be deliberate in origin.
METHODS: Ten normal subjects were examined. A torque motor induced 50 degrees wrist extension or flexion at 500 degrees /s. The subjects were relaxed or exerted a 10% maximal voluntary contraction. They were instructed either not to intervene, or to oppose the displacement, or else to assist it. Several trials were repeated at different initial angles.
RESULTS: We found a short-latency reflex (SR) in the stretched muscle, be it flexor or extensor, and a later inconstant ShoRe in the antagonist. ShoRe latency was compatible with that of a reaction time (RT), and was not influenced by the initial wrist angle. When subjects assisted the movement, the EMG burst in the shortening muscle was in every respect a RT; when they opposed the movement, the ShoRe disappeared. There was a strict temporal relationship between SR duration and ShoRe latency.
CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the brain would deliberately trigger the ShoRe on recognizing the displacement direction. The occurrence of such activity in the shortened muscle makes the SR to abruptly stop. The temporal relationship between the duration of the SR and onset of the ShoRe can be an expression of the inhibition on the SR burst by the cortical drive to the antagonist muscle being shortened, possibly through the action of spinal inhibitory interneurones. The ShoRe would complete the movement momentarily braked by the SR and redistribute the muscle tone across antagonists, appropriate for the new muscle length.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11336906     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00468-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  13 in total

1.  Proposed cortical and sub-cortical contributions to the long-latency stretch reflex in the forearm.

Authors:  Gwyn N Lewis; Melody A Polych; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Co-contraction modifies the stretch reflex elicited in muscles shortened by a joint perturbation.

Authors:  Gwyn N Lewis; Colum D MacKinnon; Randy Trumbower; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Reciprocal inhibition versus unloading response during stretch reflex in humans.

Authors:  C D Manning; P L L McDonald; C D Murnaghan; P Bawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Mechanical perturbations can elicit triggered reactions in the absence of a startle response.

Authors:  Christopher J Forgaard; Ian M Franks; Kimberly Bennett; Dana Maslovat; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Improvement in automatic postural coordination following alexander technique lessons in a person with low back pain.

Authors:  Timothy W Cacciatore; Fay B Horak; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-06

6.  Evidence for a supraspinal contribution to the human quadriceps long-latency stretch reflex.

Authors:  N Mrachacz-Kersting; M J Grey; T Sinkjaer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Stretch reflex coupling between the hip and knee: implications for impaired gait following stroke.

Authors:  James M Finley; Eric J Perreault; Yasin Y Dhaher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Differential contributions of vision, touch and muscle proprioception to the coding of hand movements.

Authors:  Caroline Blanchard; Régine Roll; Jean-Pierre Roll; Anne Kavounoudias
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Muscle Responses to Passive Joint Movements in Infants During the First Year of Life.

Authors:  Irina A Solopova; Dmitry S Zhvansky; Irina Y Dolinskaya; Elena S Keshishian; Victor A Selionov; Francesca Sylos-Labini; Francesco Lacquaniti; Yury Ivanenko
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Calibration of the Leg Muscle Responses Elicited by Predictable Perturbations of Stance and the Effect of Vision.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Antonio Nardone; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.