Literature DB >> 11336508

Differences in Krox20-dependent regulation of Hoxa2 and Hoxb2 during hindbrain development.

M K Maconochie1, S Nonchev, M Manzanares, H Marshall, R Krumlauf.   

Abstract

During hindbrain development, segmental regulation of the paralogous Hoxa2 and Hoxb2 genes in rhombomeres (r) 3 and 5 involves Krox20-dependent enhancers that have been conserved during the duplication of the vertebrate Hox clusters from a common ancestor. Examining these evolutionarily related control regions could provide important insight into the degree to which the basic Krox20-dependent mechanisms, cis-regulatory components, and their organization have been conserved. Toward this goal we have performed a detailed functional analysis of a mouse Hoxa2 enhancer capable of directing reporter expression in r3 and r5. The combined activities of five separate cis-regions, in addition to the conserved Krox20 binding sites, are involved in mediating enhancer function. A CTTT (BoxA) motif adjacent to the Krox20 binding sites is important for r3/r5 activity. The BoxA motif is similar to one (Box1) found in the Hoxb2 enhancer and indicates that the close proximity of these Box motifs to Krox20 sites is a common feature of Krox20 targets in vivo. Two other rhombomeric elements (RE1 and RE3) are essential for r3/r5 activity and share common TCT motifs, indicating that they interact with a similar cofactor(s). TCT motifs are also found in the Hoxb2 enhancer, suggesting that they may be another common feature of Krox20-dependent control regions. The two remaining Hoxa2 cis-elements, RE2 and RE4, are not conserved in the Hoxb2 enhancer and define differences in some of components that can contribute to the Krox20-dependent activities of these enhancers. Furthermore, analysis of regulatory activities of these enhancers in a Krox20 mutant background has uncovered differences in their degree of dependence upon Krox20 for segmental expression. Together, this work has revealed a surprising degree of complexity in the number of cis-elements and regulatory components that contribute to segmental expression mediated by Krox20 and sheds light on the diversity and evolution of Krox20 target sites and Hox regulatory elements in vertebrates. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11336508     DOI: 10.1006/dbio.2001.0197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


  11 in total

1.  Krox20 and kreisler co-operate in the transcriptional control of segmental expression of Hoxb3 in the developing hindbrain.

Authors:  Miguel Manzanares; Jeannette Nardelli; Pascale Gilardi-Hebenstreit; Heather Marshall; François Giudicelli; María Teresa Martínez-Pastor; Robb Krumlauf; Patrick Charnay
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  A regulatory module embedded in the coding region of Hoxa2 controls expression in rhombomere 2.

Authors:  Stefan Tümpel; Francisco Cambronero; Carrie Sims; Robb Krumlauf; Leanne M Wiedemann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Hindbrain induction and patterning during early vertebrate development.

Authors:  Dale Frank; Dalit Sela-Donenfeld
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Evolution of cis elements in the differential expression of two Hoxa2 coparalogous genes in pufferfish (Takifugu rubripes).

Authors:  Stefan Tümpel; Francisco Cambronero; Leanne M Wiedemann; Robb Krumlauf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Hox genes and their candidate downstream targets in the developing central nervous system.

Authors:  Z N Akin; A J Nazarali
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.046

6.  Evolutionary divergence of a Hoxa2b hindbrain enhancer in syngnathids mimics results of functional assays.

Authors:  Allison M Fuiten; William A Cresko
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 0.900

7.  Evolution of anterior Hox regulatory elements among chordates.

Authors:  Alfonso Natale; Carrie Sims; Maria L Chiusano; Alessandro Amoroso; Enrico D'Aniello; Laura Fucci; Robb Krumlauf; Margherita Branno; Annamaria Locascio
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  A Hox-TALE regulatory circuit for neural crest patterning is conserved across vertebrates.

Authors:  Hugo J Parker; Bony De Kumar; Stephen A Green; Karin D Prummel; Christopher Hess; Charles K Kaufman; Christian Mosimann; Leanne M Wiedemann; Marianne E Bronner; Robb Krumlauf
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Reciprocal co-regulation of EGR2 and MECP2 is disrupted in Rett syndrome and autism.

Authors:  Susan E Swanberg; Raman P Nagarajan; Sailaja Peddada; Dag H Yasui; Janine M LaSalle
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Functional and Comparative Genomics of Hoxa2 Gene cis-Regulatory Elements: Evidence for Evolutionary Modification of Ancestral Core Element Activity.

Authors:  Adam Davis; Michael C Reubens; Edmund J Stellwag
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2016-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.