Literature DB >> 11336300

Effect of convection on osteoblastic cell growth and function in biodegradable polymer foam scaffolds.

A S Goldstein1, T M Juarez, C D Helmke, M C Gustin, A G Mikos.   

Abstract

Culture of seeded osteoblastic cells in three-dimensional osteoconductive scaffolds in vitro is a promising approach to produce an osteoinductive material for repair of bone defects. However, culture of cells in scaffolds sufficiently large to bridge critical-sized defects is a challenge for tissue engineers. Diffusion may not be sufficient to supply nutrients into large scaffolds and consequently cells may grow preferentially at the periphery under static culture conditions. Three alternative culturing schemes that convect media were considered: a spinner flask, a rotary vessel, and a perfusion flow system. Poly(DL-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) foam discs (12.7 mm diameter, 6.0 mm thick, 78.8% porous) were seeded with osteoblastic marrow stromal cells and cultured in the presence of dexamethasone and L-ascorbic acid for 7 and 14 days. Cell numbers per foam were found to be similar with all culturing schemes indicating that cell growth could not be enhanced by convection, but histological analysis indicated that the rotary vessel and flow system produced a more uniform distribution of cells throughout the foams. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity per cell was higher with culture in the flow system and spinner flask after 7 days, while no differences in osteocalcin (OC) activity per cell were observed among culturing methods after 14 days in culture. Based on the higher ALP activity and better cell uniformity throughout the cultured foams, the flow system appears to be the superior culturing method, although equally important is the fact that in none of the tests did any of the alternative culturing techniques underperform the static controls. Thus, this study demonstrates that culturing techniques that utilize fluid flow, and in particular the flow perfusion system, improve the properties of the seeded cells over those maintained in static culture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Cell Biology; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11336300     DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00280-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  85 in total

1.  In vitro mineralization by preosteoblasts in poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) inverse opal scaffolds reinforced with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles.

Authors:  Sung-Wook Choi; Yu Zhang; Stavros Thomopoulos; Younan Xia
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 3.882

2.  Mineralized matrix deposition by marrow stromal osteoblasts in 3D perfusion culture increases with increasing fluid shear forces.

Authors:  Vassilios I Sikavitsas; Gregory N Bancroft; Heidi L Holtorf; John A Jansen; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Bioreactor-based bone tissue engineering: the influence of dynamic flow on osteoblast phenotypic expression and matrix mineralization.

Authors:  Xiaojun Yu; Edward A Botchwey; Elliot M Levine; Solomon R Pollack; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Osteogenic differentiation and mineralization in fibre-reinforced tubular scaffolds: theoretical study and experimental evidences.

Authors:  Vincenzo Guarino; Francesco Urciuolo; Marco A Alvarez-Perez; Benedetto Mele; Paolo A Netti; Luigi Ambrosio
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Coculture strategies in bone tissue engineering: the impact of culture conditions on pluripotent stem cell populations.

Authors:  Sathyanarayana Janardhanan; Martha O Wang; John P Fisher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 6.389

6.  Degradable segmented polyurethane elastomers for bone tissue engineering: effect of polycaprolactone content.

Authors:  Katherine D Kavlock; Kyumin Whang; Scott A Guelcher; Aaron S Goldstein
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.517

7.  Osteogenic potentials with joint-loading modality.

Authors:  Hiroki Yokota; Shigeo M Tanaka
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Evaluation of bioreactor-cultivated bone by magnetic resonance microscopy and FTIR microspectroscopy.

Authors:  Ingrid E Chesnick; Francis A Avallone; Richard D Leapman; William J Landis; Naomi Eidelman; Kimberlee Potter
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Transplantation of engineered bone tissue using a rotary three-dimensional culture system.

Authors:  Miyoko Hidaka; George Nan-Chang Su; Joy Kuan-Hao Chen; Ken-ichi Mukaisho; Takanori Hattori; Gaku Yamamoto
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2007-03-11       Impact factor: 2.416

Review 10.  Tissue engineered bone grafts: biological requirements, tissue culture and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Mirjam Fröhlich; Warren L Grayson; Leo Q Wan; Darja Marolt; Matej Drobnic; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.828

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.