OBJECTIVE: To search for an association between tuberculosis and use of biomass stoves found recently in a cross sectional study. DESIGN: In a case-control study based in a chest referral hospital, the cases were 288 patients with active smear-positive or culture-positive tuberculosis, and the controls were 545 patients with ear nose and throat ailments with no evidence of chest disease studied at the same time as the cases. Exposure to present or previous biomass smoke by history of cooking with traditional wood stoves was assessed by positive or negative response. RESULTS: Exposure to biomass smoke was significantly higher in cases than in controls. Crude odds ratios for tuberculosis and biomass smoke exposure were 5.2 (95%CI 3.1-8.9) for current exposure, 3.4 (95%CI 2.4-5.0) for past or present exposure and 1.8 (95%CI 1.1-3.0) for past exposure. The association was observed only for patients living in Metropolitan Mexico City and urban or suburban areas in the center of Mexico providing most cases and controls. For rural areas, the power of the study was low and the origin of the patients heterogeneous. Odds ratio for Mexico City Metropolitan area and the center of Mexico was 2.4 (95%CI 1.04-5.6), adjusted for age, sex, level of education, crowding, smoking, socio-economic level, zone of residence and state of birth. In the same model smoking had an OR of 1.5 (95%CI 1.0-2.3) for tuberculosis. CONCLUSION: Our results support a causal role of current domestic biomass smoke exposure in tuberculosis.
OBJECTIVE: To search for an association between tuberculosis and use of biomass stoves found recently in a cross sectional study. DESIGN: In a case-control study based in a chest referral hospital, the cases were 288 patients with active smear-positive or culture-positive tuberculosis, and the controls were 545 patients with ear nose and throat ailments with no evidence of chest disease studied at the same time as the cases. Exposure to present or previous biomass smoke by history of cooking with traditional wood stoves was assessed by positive or negative response. RESULTS: Exposure to biomass smoke was significantly higher in cases than in controls. Crude odds ratios for tuberculosis and biomass smoke exposure were 5.2 (95%CI 3.1-8.9) for current exposure, 3.4 (95%CI 2.4-5.0) for past or present exposure and 1.8 (95%CI 1.1-3.0) for past exposure. The association was observed only for patients living in Metropolitan Mexico City and urban or suburban areas in the center of Mexico providing most cases and controls. For rural areas, the power of the study was low and the origin of the patients heterogeneous. Odds ratio for Mexico City Metropolitan area and the center of Mexico was 2.4 (95%CI 1.04-5.6), adjusted for age, sex, level of education, crowding, smoking, socio-economic level, zone of residence and state of birth. In the same model smoking had an OR of 1.5 (95%CI 1.0-2.3) for tuberculosis. CONCLUSION: Our results support a causal role of current domestic biomass smoke exposure in tuberculosis.
Authors: Michael N Bates; Karl Pope; Tula Ram Sijali; Amod K Pokhrel; Ajay Pillarisetti; Nicholas L Lam; Sharat C Verma Journal: Environ Res Date: 2018-09-27 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Martha Torres; Claudia Carranza; Srijata Sarkar; Yolanda Gonzalez; Alvaro Osornio Vargas; Kathleen Black; Qingyu Meng; Raul Quintana-Belmares; Martha Hernandez; Jose Juan F Angeles Garcia; Victor Hugo Páramo-Figueroa; Marco Antonio Iñiguez-Garcia; Jose L Flores; Junfeng Jim Zhang; Carol R Gardner; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Stephan Schwander Journal: Thorax Date: 2019-04-29 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: James R Hargreaves; Delia Boccia; Carlton A Evans; Michelle Adato; Mark Petticrew; John D H Porter Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Eric A Engels; Min Shen; Robert S Chapman; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Ying-Ying Yu; Xingzhou He; Qing Lan Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2009-03-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Amod K Pokhrel; Michael N Bates; Sharat C Verma; Hari S Joshi; Chandrashekhar T Sreeramareddy; Kirk R Smith Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Dennis Emuron; Trishul Siddharthan; Brooks Morgan; Suzanne L Pollard; Matthew R Grigsby; Dina Goodman; Muhammad Chowdhury; Adolfo Rubinstein; Vilma Irazola; Laura Gutierrez; J Jaime Miranda; Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz; Dewan Alam; Bruce Kirenga; Rupert Jones; Frederik van Gemert; William Checkley Journal: Lung Date: 2019-10-03 Impact factor: 2.584