Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Comparative pathology of the diseases caused by Hendra and Nipah viruses.

Literature DB >> 11334749

Comparative pathology of the diseases caused by Hendra and Nipah viruses.

P Hooper¹, S Zaki, P Daniels, D Middleton.

Abstract

Information on the pathogenesis and transmissibility of Hendra and Nipah viruses was obtained by comparing their histopathology. Both viruses induced syncytial cells in vascular tissues and they were primarily vasotropic and/or neurotropic, generating interstitial pneumonia or encephalitis. Nipah virus in pigs was also epitheliotropic in respiratory epithelium and thus contagious.

Entities: Disease Species

Mesh：

Year: 2001 PMID： 11334749 DOI： 10.1016/s1286-4579(01)01385-5

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbes Infect ISSN： 1286-4579 Impact factor: 2.700

Keyword Cloud
Cited

80 in total

1. Nipah virus infection: pathology and pathogenesis of an emerging paramyxoviral zoonosis.

Authors: Kum Thong Wong; Wun-Ju Shieh; Shalini Kumar; Karim Norain; Wahidah Abdullah; Jeannette Guarner; Cynthia S Goldsmith; Kaw Bing Chua; Sai Kit Lam; Chong Tin Tan; Khean Jin Goh; Heng Thay Chong; Rani Jusoh; Pierre E Rollin; Thomas G Ksiazek; Sherif R Zaki
Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2. The immune response to Nipah virus infection.

Authors: Joseph Prescott; Emmie de Wit; Heinz Feldmann; Vincent J Munster
Journal: Arch Virol Date: 2012-06-06 Impact factor: 2.574

3. Nipah virus V and W proteins have a common STAT1-binding domain yet inhibit STAT1 activation from the cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments, respectively.

Authors: Megan L Shaw; Adolfo García-Sastre; Peter Palese; Christopher F Basler
Journal: J Virol Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.103

4. Activation of the Nipah virus fusion protein in MDCK cells is mediated by cathepsin B within the endosome-recycling compartment.

Authors: Sandra Diederich; Lucie Sauerhering; Michael Weis; Hermann Altmeppen; Norbert Schaschke; Thomas Reinheckel; Stephanie Erbar; Andrea Maisner
Journal: J Virol Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 5.103

Review 5. The ecology of emerging neurotropic viruses.

Authors: Kevin J Olival; Peter Daszak
Journal: J Neurovirol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 2.643

6. Potent neutralization of Hendra and Nipah viruses by human monoclonal antibodies.

Authors: Zhongyu Zhu; Antony S Dimitrov; Katharine N Bossart; Gary Crameri; Kimberly A Bishop; Vidita Choudhry; Bruce A Mungall; Yan-Ru Feng; Anil Choudhary; Mei-Yun Zhang; Yang Feng; Lin-Fa Wang; Xiaodong Xiao; Bryan T Eaton; Christopher C Broder; Dimiter S Dimitrov
Journal: J Virol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 5.103

Comparative pathology of the diseases caused by Hendra and Nipah viruses.

1. Nipah virus infection: pathology and pathogenesis of an emerging paramyxoviral zoonosis.

Review 2. The immune response to Nipah virus infection.

3. Nipah virus V and W proteins have a common STAT1-binding domain yet inhibit STAT1 activation from the cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments, respectively.

4. Activation of the Nipah virus fusion protein in MDCK cells is mediated by cathepsin B within the endosome-recycling compartment.

Review 5. The ecology of emerging neurotropic viruses.

6. Potent neutralization of Hendra and Nipah viruses by human monoclonal antibodies.

7. Antibody prophylaxis and therapy against Nipah virus infection in hamsters.

8. Ubiquitous activation of the Nipah virus fusion protein does not require a basic amino acid at the cleavage site.

9. Ephrin-B2 expression critically influences Nipah virus infection independent of its cytoplasmic tail.

10. Targeted strategies for henipavirus therapeutics.