Literature DB >> 11332840

Bumble bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) activity and pollination levels in commercial tomato greenhouses.

L A Morandin1, T M Laverty, P G Kevan.   

Abstract

Commercial greenhouse studies were conducted to assess levels of pollination of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) flowers in relation to bumble bee (Bombus impatiens Cresson) colony activity and colony densities. For the assessment of pollination levels of tomato flowers, five categories were defined based on bruising levels caused by bumble bee pollination. Colony activity was measured as bee trips per ha/d using electric powered photodiode monitors inserted into the hive entrance. Levels of pollination were positively correlated with bee activity levels, up to a mean of approximately 400 pollen grains per stigma per day, after which greater activity did not result in further increases in daily pollination levels. Densities of colonies in the commercial greenhouses studied ranged from 7.6 to 19.8 colonies per hectare with a mean of 11.6 +/- 0.9. We found that an average activity of 2,000 bee trips per hectare per day was more than adequate to ensure sufficient pollination, and that this level of activity could be achieved with 7-15 colonies per hectare, depending on greenhouse conditions. Greenhouses requiring >15 colonies per hectare to achieve this level of pollination may be able to increase bee activity through alteration of greenhouse conditions. Across 50-m rows of tomato plants, levels of pollination decreased with increasing distance from bee colonies, suggesting that colonies should be evenly distributed throughout the greenhouses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11332840     DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-94.2.462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  10 in total

1.  No effect of dual exposure to sulfoxaflor and a trypanosome parasite on bumblebee olfactory learning.

Authors:  Owen P Vaughan; Edward A Straw; Alberto Linguadoca; Mark J F Brown
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  The relationship between managed bees and the prevalence of parasites in bumblebees.

Authors:  Peter Graystock; Dave Goulson; William O H Hughes
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Infrared Efficiency and Ultraviolet Management of Red-Pigmented Polymethylmethacrylate Photoselective Greenhouse Films.

Authors:  Norah Alwadai; Samah El-Bashir
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.329

4.  The potential for parasite spill-back from commercial bumblebee colonies: a neglected threat to wild bees?

Authors:  Callum D Martin; Michelle T Fountain; Mark J F Brown
Journal:  J Insect Conserv       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.262

Review 5.  Impacts of Neonicotinoids on the Bumble Bees Bombus terrestris and Bombus impatiens Examined through the Lens of an Adverse Outcome Pathway Framework.

Authors:  Allison A Camp; David M Lehmann
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.218

6.  Effects of the Neonicotinoid Acetamiprid in Pollen on Bombus impatiens Microcolony Development.

Authors:  Allison A Camp; Michael A Batres; Wanda C Williams; Robert W Koethe; Kimberly A Stoner; David M Lehmann
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.218

7.  Does pathogen spillover from commercially reared bumble bees threaten wild pollinators?

Authors:  Michael C Otterstatter; James D Thomson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Worldwide Alien Invasion: A Methodological Approach to Forecast the Potential Spread of a Highly Invasive Pollinator.

Authors:  André L Acosta; Tereza C Giannini; Vera L Imperatriz-Fonseca; Antonio M Saraiva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effects of the neonicotinoid acetamiprid in syrup on Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae) microcolony development.

Authors:  Allison A Camp; Wanda C Williams; Brian D Eitzer; Robert W Koethe; David M Lehmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Buzz-Pollinated Crops: A Global Review and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Supplemental Bee Pollination in Tomato.

Authors:  Hazel Cooley; Mario Vallejo-Marín
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.381

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.