Literature DB >> 11332520

Efficacy of directional microphone hearing aids: a meta-analytic perspective.

A M Amlani1.   

Abstract

The literature suggests that directional microphone hearing aids (DMHAs) are a viable means for improving the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for hearing-impaired listeners. The amount of directional advantage they provide, however, remains relatively unclear because of variability observed among individual studies. The present investigation was undertaken in an attempt to establish the degree of advantage provided by DMHAs. Data were synthesized from 72 and 74 experiments, respectively, on omnidirectional hearing aids and DMHAs representing both favorable and unfavorable outcomes. Using a meta-analytic approach, 138 weighted averages were derived for a variety of comparable independent and dependent variables. Comparisons were made for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. Findings are discussed with regard to their clinical and research implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11332520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  12 in total

1.  Effectiveness of the directional microphone in the Baha® Divino™.

Authors:  Kristi Oeding; Michael Valente; Jessica Kerckhoff
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 2.  Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part I. Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies and noise reduction algorithms.

Authors:  King Chung
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

3.  Methods and applications of the audibility index in hearing aid selection and fitting.

Authors:  Amyn M Amlani; Jerry L Punch; Teresa Y C Ching
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-09

4.  Adaptive spatial filtering improves speech reception in noise while preserving binaural cues.

Authors:  Susan R S Bissmeyer; Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Evaluating the Performance of a Visually Guided Hearing Aid Using a Dynamic Auditory-Visual Word Congruence Task.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Timothy Streeter; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Evaluation of different signal processing options in unilateral and bilateral cochlear freedom implant recipients using R-Space background noise.

Authors:  Alison M Brockmeyer; Lisa G Potts
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 7.  An evidence-based systematic review of directional microphones and digital noise reduction hearing aids in school-age children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Rebecca A Venediktov; Jaumeiko J Coleman; Hillary M Leech
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 1.493

8.  Monaural Beamforming in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users: Effect of (A)symmetric Directivity and Noise Type.

Authors:  Elke M J Devocht; A Miranda L Janssen; Josef Chalupper; Robert J Stokroos; Erwin L J George
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Deep band modulated phrase perception in quiet and noise in individuals with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder and sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Hemanth Narayan Shetty; Vishal Kooknoor
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.867

10.  The just-noticeable difference in speech-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  David McShefferty; William M Whitmer; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.